citedby: 73704127

Manish Tiwari vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 17 November, 2021

11. o`{kkjksi.k esa ;k isM+ksa dh ns[kHkky esa vkosnd dh vksj ls dh xbZ dksbZ Hkh pwd vkosnd dks tekur dk ykHk ysus ls oafpr dj ldrh gSA THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH 4 M.Cr.C. No. 52070/2021 (Manish Tiwari Vs. State of M.P.)

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A Pathak - Full Document

Manish Kumar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 29 November, 2021

(Manish Kumar Vs. State of M.P.) In view of the outbreak of 'Corona Virus disease (COVID-19)' the concerned Jail Authority is directed to follow the directions/guidelines issued by the Government with regard to COVID-19 before releasing the applicant.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S K Singh - Full Document

Sourabh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 May, 2022

But the order dated 13.05.2022 has been wrongly typed in MCRC.No.21173/2022 (Sourabh Vs. State of M.P.) Counsel for the respondent/State as well Counsel for respondent/objector are not disputing the same.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Roshanlal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 May, 2022

But the order dated 13.05.2022 has been wrongly typed in MCRC.No.21173/2022 (Sourabh Vs. State of M.P.) Counsel for the respondent/State as well Counsel for respondent/objector are not disputing the same.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Bhupendra Singh Gurjar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 24 February, 2026

So far as the order passed in Manish Kumar Tiwari (supra) is concerned, the co-ordinate Bench has already held that opportunity of hearing is required to be given to an employee once he has visited with a stigmatic order and in the present case stigmatic termination order has been issued. The order cited by learned counsel for the State is not applicable in the present case.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak Singh Baghel vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 October, 2024

decided on 09.08.2024 and Cr.A. No. 3938/2023 (Manish Kumar Tiwari vs. The State of M.P.) decided on 24.08.2023 . Therefore, the remaining jail sentence of the appellant may be suspended.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Dwivedi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 October, 2024

decided on 09.08.2024 and Cr.A. No. 3938/2023 (Manish Kumar Tiwari vs. The State of M.P.) decided on 24.08.2023 . Therefore, the remaining jail sentence of the appellant may be suspended.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sagar Khan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 October, 2024

decided on 09.08.2024 and Cr.A. No. 3938/2023 (Manish Kumar Tiwari vs. The State of M.P.) decided on 24.08.2023 . Therefore, the remaining jail sentence of the appellant may be suspended.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document

Sourabh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 17 November, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - V Dhagat - Full Document

Sourabh Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 December, 2021

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C. No. 60348/2021 (Sourabh Mishra Vs. State of M.P. ) 2 This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R K Dubey - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results