Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.02 seconds)

Star India Private Limited vs M/S Noida Software Technology Park ... on 22 January, 2016

(i) Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Chandan Nagar, West Bengal Vs. Dunlop India Ltd. (1985) 1 SCC 260; (ii) Tin Plate Co. of India Vs. State of Bihar (1998) 8 SCC 272; (iii) Punjab National Bank Vs. O.C. Krishnan (2001) 6 SCC 569; (iv) Star India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Life Style Communication Pvt. Ltd. 146 (2008) DLT 230; (v) Nivedita Sharma Vs. Cellular Operators Association of India (2011) 14 SCC 337; (vi) judgment dated 23 rd February, W.P.(C) No.70/2016 Page 9 of 16 2012 in W.P.(C) No.1077/2012 titled Union of India Vs. Aircel Limited; (vii) Bela Rani Bhattacharya Vs. Union of India 212 (2014) DLT 1; (viii) Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Chhabil Dass Agarwal (2014) 1 SCC 603;
Delhi High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 1 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Reliance Communications Ltd. vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. on 6 July, 2011

22. The senior counsel for the petitioner faced with the aforesaid relies upon Star India P. Ltd. Vs. Life Style Communication P. Ltd. 146 (2008) DLT 230 where this Court held that judicial review of orders of TDSAT is permissible. However I find that even in Star India P. Ltd. it was held that where the order of such a Tribunal is an interim one--jurisdiction of this Court gets even more circumscribed and orders can be interfered with only where they disclose manifest error apparent on the face of the record such as when they are based on clear ignorance or utter disregard of provisions of law and grave injustice or gross failure of justice has been occasioned.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R S Endlaw - Full Document
1