Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)

Jethmal vs The State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 27 September, 1984

The Division Bench consisting of Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.K. Mal Lodha and Hon'ble Miss Justice Kanta Bhatnagar had reviewed the entire case law concerning the compulsory retirement and I need nor repeat all what has already been said in the aforesaid judgment. The application of Rule 244(2) of the R.S.R. was again considered by this Court in Deo Narain v. State of Raj. and Ors. 1982 WLN (UC) 324, wherein also guide lines were provided.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 11 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Dharma vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 September, 1993

2. We have heard Mr. Suresh Kumbhat, learned Amicus curiae and Mr. V.R. Mehta, learned Public Prosecutor. The contention of Mr. Kumbhat is that it is not disputed that the fatal blow on the body of pura was inflicted by Dharma which has resulted in his death. P.W. 2 Dr. Surendra Singh has categorically stated that this injury was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause his death as it has cut a major portion of his neck and the can...dartery was completely cut and, therefore, the death is homicidal. However, Mr. Kumbhat has further submitted that accused has caused this injury in the exercise of his right of private defence of person because the injury was inflicted on his head by an axe by deceased Pura and, therefore, he could have caused any injury on the person of the deceased because danger to cause grievous injury to him was very much imminent and consequently he deserves to be acquitted and in this respect he has placed the reliance on a decision of their Lordships on the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in George Dominic Varkey v. State of Kerala reported in 1971 CAR 259 (SC) and Anr. decision of Hon'ble the Supreme Court rendered in Deo Narain v. State of Raj. reported in 1973 CAR 72 (SC).
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1