Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.42 seconds)

State Of Karnataka vs Kenchaveerappa on 21 November, 2022

20. It is relevant to note that in matters involving a case and a counter case, it is always desirable that both the cases are tried by one and the same court in order to 30 ascertain who is the aggressor in a scuffle involving two groups. The manner in which the trial has to be held has been dealt in detail in the case reported in the case of K.M.Ganesh v. State of Karnataka5. In this decision, the meaning of simultaneous trial has been elaborately discussed by the Single Bench of this Court.
Karnataka High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - K Somashekar - Full Document

Sri Poojari Pedanna S/O Rama Bovi vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 9 April, 2009

Tha"v.rg$pon'defit' M§';.3 is directed to pay the entire cbgt of.Vat.q;V;i::=;'itiors indepencéenfly cf the amounts paié respondent Ne.3 to Snyuths Poojari V "-'__.Peri'fi2iv_r}ri.§v,5"Rajappa and Chinnaswarny. There was nce_"ba.r"'to enter into an agreement cf purchase. In A. t:.?1'i'$..regard, he has raked an a judgment of the ~EHon'bia Suprema Court in the case of M13. Murudeshwara C m Limited and Another V. H. 26 State of Kamataka and Others reported in ILR 2902 KAR 273.
Karnataka High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 3 - A Hinchigeri - Full Document
1