Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs Pappammal on 19 September, 2017

6. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent / plaintiff, in support of his contentions, placed reliance upon the decisions reported in 2013-1- L.W.58 [Paramanandan vs. Selvanagaki and others], 2013 (1) MWN (Civil) 278 [Pandiarajan and others vs. R.Rajammal and another], 2016 (2) MWN (Civil) 233 [N.Pappayee Ammal and others vs. P.Ramasamy], 2016 (2) MWN (Civil) 578 [M.Somasundaram and others vs. Vetrivel], 2016 (3) MWN (Civil) 404 [A.Abitha Nachi vs. K.S.Saroja and others] and 2016 (1) MWN (Civil) 721 [Hemamalini vs. T.Sakunthala]. The principles of law outlined in the above cited decisions are taken into consideration and followed as applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case at hand.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - T Ravindran - Full Document
1