Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18915 (2.17 seconds)
Documents citing National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi Son Of Late Prashant Sethi ... on 20 April, 2011

Smt. Subh Laxmi Devi @ Shuv Lakshmi Devi vs Sh. Kailash Mandal on 22 September, 2018

In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case and in view of decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of    "National Insurance Company  Ltd.  Vs. Pranay  Sethi  &  Ors."  mentioned supra,  a sum  of Rs. 15,000/­ each is awarded in favour of petitioners on account of loss of estate and funeral expenses.
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Surendra Singh And Another vs Vijay Singh And Another on 19 January, 2018

Reliance placed by the learned counsel for the insurers on the judgments of the Calcutta and Delhi High Court, do not commend to me for the reason that the issue, as discussed above appears to have been authoritatively answered by the Supreme Court in the case of National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and Ors (supra) and it may be fruitless on part of this Court to consider the issue any further. Then, in any case it is settled principle of law that I am bound by the division bench judgments of this Court which are all consistent, categorical and now, also found to be in conformity with the decision of the aforesaid judgment of the Supreme Court.
Allahabad High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 2 - S D Singh - Full Document

Kavita & Ors., Jasram, Ritesh And Shyam ... vs . Swarn Singh & Anr. on 28 July, 2021

to be 10.05.1990. The date of accident is 23.12.2012. In view of said document, his age was about 22 years of age as on the date of accident. Hence, the appropriate multiplier would be 18 in view of recent pronouncement made by Constitutional Bench of Apex Court in the case titled as "National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors.", passed in SLP(Civil) No. 25590/14 decided on 31.10.17. The monthly notional income of petitioner has been taken as Rs.7254/­ per month as discussed above. Thus, the loss of monthly future income would be Rs.2031/­ (Rs.7254x 28/100 ). The total loss of future income would be Rs.6,14,174/­ (rounded off Rs.6,14,200/­)(Rs.2031x 140/100 x 12 x18).
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suman, Luv And Kuldeep Kumar (3 Cases) vs . Vikash Kumar & Ors. on 26 October, 2020

20. Considering the fact that deceased was below 40 years of age and was doing private job at that time, future prospects @ 40% has to be awarded in favour of petitioners in view of recent pronouncement made by Constitutional Bench of Apex Court in the case titled as "National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors." mentioned supra, as well as in view of recent decision of Page no.11 of total 39 MACP no. 5653/16, 6128/16, 6129/16, 6130/16 and 6238/16 Suman, Luv and Kuldeep Kumar (3 cases) Vs. Vikash Kumar & Ors.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sharda Pareek vs Ashok Kumar on 9 January, 2019

Appeal No. 2710/2010 Dyses.V dks Hkfo";orhZ vk; dh en esa jkf'k fnykbZ xbZ gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa mDr U;k; n`"VkUr esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa dks lEiw.kZ :i ls bl ekeys esa ykxw fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA vr% mDr U;k; n`"VkUr dh jks'kuh esa ikjEifjd enksa (Conventional heads) ds rgr v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk fnyk;s x;s nkg laLdkj dh en esa 5]000@& :i;s esa o`f) djrs gq, 15]000@& :i;s ,oa e`rd dh iRuh dks lgthou {kfr dh en esa fnyk;s x;s 10]000@& :i;s esa o`f) djrs gq, 40]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj bu enksa esa izR;sd rhu o"kZ esa nl izfr'kr dh o`f) fd;k tkuk Hkh mfpr gSA orZeku ekeys esa ?kVuk o"kZ 2000 dh gS] ftldks 18 o"kZ O;rhr gks pqds gSaA vr% nkg laLdkj dh en esa 24]000@& :i;s ,oa lgthou dh {kfr dh en esa 64]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k fu/kkZfjr dh tkrh gSA tgkWa rd e`rd ds vkfJrksa dks ekufld o 'kkjhfjd d"V@Lusg oapuk (Love and Affection) esa fnykbZ xbZ jkf'k dks {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ls de fd;s tkus ds dze esa ;ksX; vf/koDrk chek dEiuh ds rdZ dk iz'u gS] bl dze esa bl U;k;ky; ds fouez er esa ikjEifjd en (Conventional heads) dh ifjHkk"kk ;|fi U;k; n`"VkUr Rajesh Vs. Rajbir ds ekeys esa foosfpr gS rFkk blesa izse o Lusg dh en dks ikjEifjd en dh Js.kh esa vafdr fd;k x;k gS] fdUrq U;k; n`"VkUr National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us bl en dks ikjEifjd enksa (Conventional heads) esa ugha ekuk x;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk bl en esa fnykbZ xbZ 10]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k dks ikjEifjd enksa (Conventional heads) esa ugha ekuk tkdj bl en esa fdlh izdkj dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k Dyses.V dks fnyk;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA (Downloaded on 05/06/2021 at 08:07:09 PM) 27 (1)S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1371/2004 (2)S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1919/2004 (3)S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1998/2005 (4)S.B. Civil Misc.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

United India Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Sheela Pareek And Ors on 9 January, 2019

Appeal No. 2710/2010 Dyses.V dks Hkfo";orhZ vk; dh en esa jkf'k fnykbZ xbZ gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa mDr U;k; n`"VkUr esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa dks lEiw.kZ :i ls bl ekeys esa ykxw fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA vr% mDr U;k; n`"VkUr dh jks'kuh esa ikjEifjd enksa (Conventional heads) ds rgr v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk fnyk;s x;s nkg laLdkj dh en esa 5]000@& :i;s esa o`f) djrs gq, 15]000@& :i;s ,oa e`rd dh iRuh dks lgthou {kfr dh en esa fnyk;s x;s 10]000@& :i;s esa o`f) djrs gq, 40]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj bu enksa esa izR;sd rhu o"kZ esa nl izfr'kr dh o`f) fd;k tkuk Hkh mfpr gSA orZeku ekeys esa ?kVuk o"kZ 2000 dh gS] ftldks 18 o"kZ O;rhr gks pqds gSaA vr% nkg laLdkj dh en esa 24]000@& :i;s ,oa lgthou dh {kfr dh en esa 64]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k fu/kkZfjr dh tkrh gSA tgkWa rd e`rd ds vkfJrksa dks ekufld o 'kkjhfjd d"V@Lusg oapuk (Love and Affection) esa fnykbZ xbZ jkf'k dks {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ls de fd;s tkus ds dze esa ;ksX; vf/koDrk chek dEiuh ds rdZ dk iz'u gS] bl dze esa bl U;k;ky; ds fouez er esa ikjEifjd en (Conventional heads) dh ifjHkk"kk ;|fi U;k; n`"VkUr Rajesh Vs. Rajbir ds ekeys esa foosfpr gS rFkk blesa izse o Lusg dh en dks ikjEifjd en dh Js.kh esa vafdr fd;k x;k gS] fdUrq U;k; n`"VkUr National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us bl en dks ikjEifjd enksa (Conventional heads) esa ugha ekuk x;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk bl en esa fnykbZ xbZ 10]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k dks ikjEifjd enksa (Conventional heads) esa ugha ekuk tkdj bl en esa fdlh izdkj dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k Dyses.V dks fnyk;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA (Downloaded on 05/06/2021 at 08:07:15 PM) 27 (1)S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1371/2004 (2)S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1919/2004 (3)S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1998/2005 (4)S.B. Civil Misc.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt Sheela Pareek And Ors vs Suresh Chand And Ors on 9 January, 2019

Appeal No. 2710/2010 Dyses.V dks Hkfo";orhZ vk; dh en esa jkf'k fnykbZ xbZ gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa mDr U;k; n`"VkUr esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa dks lEiw.kZ :i ls bl ekeys esa ykxw fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA vr% mDr U;k; n`"VkUr dh jks'kuh esa ikjEifjd enksa (Conventional heads) ds rgr v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk fnyk;s x;s nkg laLdkj dh en esa 5]000@& :i;s esa o`f) djrs gq, 15]000@& :i;s ,oa e`rd dh iRuh dks lgthou {kfr dh en esa fnyk;s x;s 10]000@& :i;s esa o`f) djrs gq, 40]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj bu enksa esa izR;sd rhu o"kZ esa nl izfr'kr dh o`f) fd;k tkuk Hkh mfpr gSA orZeku ekeys esa ?kVuk o"kZ 2000 dh gS] ftldks 18 o"kZ O;rhr gks pqds gSaA vr% nkg laLdkj dh en esa 24]000@& :i;s ,oa lgthou dh {kfr dh en esa 64]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k fu/kkZfjr dh tkrh gSA tgkWa rd e`rd ds vkfJrksa dks ekufld o 'kkjhfjd d"V@Lusg oapuk (Love and Affection) esa fnykbZ xbZ jkf'k dks {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ls de fd;s tkus ds dze esa ;ksX; vf/koDrk chek dEiuh ds rdZ dk iz'u gS] bl dze esa bl U;k;ky; ds fouez er esa ikjEifjd en (Conventional heads) dh ifjHkk"kk ;|fi U;k; n`"VkUr Rajesh Vs. Rajbir ds ekeys esa foosfpr gS rFkk blesa izse o Lusg dh en dks ikjEifjd en dh Js.kh esa vafdr fd;k x;k gS] fdUrq U;k; n`"VkUr National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us bl en dks ikjEifjd enksa (Conventional heads) esa ugha ekuk x;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk bl en esa fnykbZ xbZ 10]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k dks ikjEifjd enksa (Conventional heads) esa ugha ekuk tkdj bl en esa fdlh izdkj dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k Dyses.V dks fnyk;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA (Downloaded on 05/06/2021 at 08:07:10 PM) 27 (1)S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1371/2004 (2)S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1919/2004 (3)S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1998/2005 (4)S.B. Civil Misc.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next