Kuldeep Singh @ Karamjit Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 20 January, 2023
Same view has also been taken by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in
"Davinder Vaid vs State of Punjab and another" (CRM-M-2832-2017,
decided on 04.10.2017).
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.53 seconds)Documents citing
Davinder Vaid vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 4 October, 2017
Harpartap Singh Alias Partap Singh vs State Of Punjab on 2 August, 2023
"It has been contended by counsel for the petitioner
that petitioner was falsely implicated in this case. He
submits that after registration of FIR, both the parties have
1 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 03-08-2023 06:53:12 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:099159
CRM-M No.17071 of 2023 2023: PHHC: 099159
2
amicably resolved the issue and compromise was arrived at
between the parties for an amount of Rs.4.00 lakhs out of
which the petitioner had already paid Rs.3.00 lakhs.
However, after having received the amount of Rs.3.00
lakhs, the complainant backed out from the compromise.
He submits that petitioner has already filed a petition for
quashing of the FIR, which is pending adjudication. He
relies upon judicial precedents of this Court in Deepak
Arora vs State of Haryana, passed in CRM-M-2601-2013
on 29.07.2015, Nishan Singh vs State of Punjab, passed in
CRM-M-36879-2016 on 10.08.2018, Ram Lal vs State of
Haryana passed in CRM-M-16421-2007 on 25.01.2008,
Sandip Somany vs State of Haryana passed in CRM-M-
8431 and 8432 of 2014 and CRM-M-37933-2014 on
23.02.2016 and Davinder Vaid vs State of Punjab and
another passed in CRM-M-2832-2017 on 04.10.2017. He
further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedents
and in view of the above facts, no case for custodial
interrogation is made out, however, he is ready to join the
investigation and abide by all the terms and conditions of
the anticipatory bail if this Court considers his request for
granting the same."
1