Nitin Khurana & Anr. vs State Nct Of Delhi & Anr. on 28 January, 2016
8. Perusal of record clearly shows that there are specific
allegations against the petitioners-herein to the effect that they
harassed the complainant for or in connection with demand of dowry.
The learned Metropolitan Magistrate has taken cognizance of the
offences against the petitioners under Section 190 Cr.P.C. as it is
apparent that there was sufficient material before the learned MM for
taking the cognizance. The contention of the learned counsel for the
petitioners that provision of Section 319 Cr.P.C. has not been applied
by the learned MM, is without any basis inasmuch as the learned MM
was having jurisdiction to summon the petitioners after taking
cognizance under Section 190 Cr.P.C. Thus, the petitioners cannot
get any assistance from the judgment in the case of Satish Rana
(supra).