Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.39 seconds)

Grishna Tudu vs Human Resource Development on 11 May, 2015

Having regard to the aforesaid facts and the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court on the subject, it is deemed expropriate to dispose of this writ petition by allowing the petitioner to approach the respondent no.2, the Secretary, Department of Human Resource and Development, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi for redressal of his grievances in accordance with law as also in view of judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Jharkhand & ors Vs. Asgar Ali & ors. (Supra) within a reasonable time, preferably within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the petitioner's representation. Needless to say, it would be open for the respondent no.2 to take a decision in the matter of payment of admissible dues of salary in phases as per the direction passed in the judgment by the Hon'ble Apex Court.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document

Parmeshwar Nanda vs The State Of Jharkhand Chief Secretary on 7 February, 2020

11. The argument is that the issue relating to arrears of salary for the period 16th May, 2001 till the date of the absorption of the 6 employees under notification dated 30th May, 2007 stands concluded by an order passed by this Court in State of Jharkhand & Ors. v. Asgar Ali & Ors.4, therefore, the appellants are entitled to consequential benefits of pension.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 5 - H Gupta - Full Document

Murari Prasad vs The State Of Jharkhand on 5 January, 2023

4. Ms. Rita Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are also entitled for arrears of salary for the said period in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of State of Jharkhand & Ors. Vs. Asgar Ali & Ors. passed in SLP (C) Case No.10361-10364 of 2014. She further submits that after filing of the writ petition though the some amount of arrears/salary was paid to the petitioners, but the petitioners are still aggrieved as they are entitled for full salary/arrears for the said period in view of judicial pronouncement. She draws the attention of the Court towards counter-affidavit and rejoinder affidavit and submits that admittedly, the respondents have taken shelter of one Letter dated 17.03.2015 in making the payment to the employees, but the said letter is not inconsonance with the order of the Hon'ble Apex Court. However, the said letter is not under challenge.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S N Pathak - Full Document

C482/2404/2019 on 31 October, 2019

This criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing the impugned summoning order dated 09.07.2018 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Case No. 3606 of 2018 "State vs. Asgar and others" under Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 504, 307 and 342 of I.P.C. registered at PS I.T.I. District Udham Singh Nagar pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. qua the applicants.
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - N S Dhanik - Full Document
1