Kamlesh Kumar vs Board Of Revenue Lucknow And Others on 3 May, 2023
18. In the present case there is a transitory provision contained in Section 10 of the amendment Act which save only those proceedings which were pending before the Board of Revenue. Thus, the proceeding which was pending before the Additional Commissioner on 18.08.1997 was required to be decided under the provisions of Section 219 of the amended Act. We are, therefore, unable to subscribe to the view taken by the learned Judge in Kali Shanker Dwivedi (supra) and agree with the view taken in Sri Ram (supra)."