Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 58 (0.87 seconds)
Documents citing Dalbir Singh And Ors. vs State Of Punjab on 10 April, 1987

State Of H.P. vs Vinod Kumar on 7 June, 1994

In Dalbir Singh v. State of Punjab, (AIR 1987 SC 1328), the dying declaration was, of course, recorded by Sub-Inspector Jagar Nath, however, the question whether the Police Officer could record it or not, was not in consideration. The dying declaration was assailed on the grounds that it did not contain precise description of all the instruments of offence and also precise description of the manner in which the injuries were inflicted.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 2 - L S Panta - Full Document

Sc No.6542/16, State vs . Sumeet @ Akki Etc., Fir No.477/2013, Ps ... on 20 April, 2019

In "Dalbir Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1987 SC 1328", no hard and fast rule can be laid down about the appreciation of evidence and every case has to be judged on the basis of its own facts. While appreciating the evidence of the witness, the approach must be whether the evidence of a witness read as a whole appears to have ring of truth. Once that impression is formed, it is undoubtedly, necessary for the court to scrutinize the evidence more particularly, keeping in view the deficiency, drawbacks and the infirmities pointed out in the evidence as a whole, and evaluate them to find out whether it is against the general tenor of evidence given by the witness as to render it unworthy of belief.
Delhi District Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Case No. Sc/9435/16 Ncb vs . Anuj Gosain & Anr. Dated: 12.02.2020 ... on 12 February, 2020

In "Dalbir Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1987 SC 1328", no hard and fast rule can be laid down about the appreciation of evidence and every case has to be judged on the basis of its own facts. While appreciating the evidence of the witness, the approach must be whether the evidence of a witness read as a whole appears to have ring of truth. Once that impression is formed, it is undoubtedly, necessary for the court to scrutinize the evidence more particularly, keeping in view the deficiency, drawbacks and the infirmities pointed out in the evidence as a whole, and evaluate them to find out whether it is against the general tenor of evidence given by the witness as to render it unworthy of belief. In 'Bhagwan Tana Patil Vs. state of Maharashtra, AIR 1974 SC 21', the apex court ordained that the function of the court is to disengage the truth from the falsehood and to accept what it finds the truth and rejects the rest. It is only where the truth and falsehood are inextricably mixed up, polluted beyond refinement down the core, the entire fabric of the narration given by a witness then the court might be justified in rejecting the same.
Delhi District Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt Kumud Mittal vs The State Of Nct Delhi on 12 April, 2021

In "Dalbir Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1987 SC 1328", no hard and fast rule can be laid down about the appreciation of evidence and every case has to be judged on the basis of its own facts. While appreciating the evidence of the witness, the approach must be whether the evidence of a witness read as a whole appears to have ring of truth. Once that impression is formed, it is undoubtedly, necessary for the court to scrutinize the evidence more particularly, keeping in view the deficiency, drawbacks and the infirmities pointed out in the evidence as a whole, and evaluate them to find out whether it is against the general tenor of evidence given by the witness as to render it unworthy of belief.
Delhi District Court Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Case No. Sc/64/19 Ncb vs . Mohamed Anas Dated: 11.06.2021 Page ... on 11 June, 2021

Mere defective investigation cannot vitiate the trial (Paramjit Singh Vs. state of Punjab AIR Case No. SC/64/19 NCB Vs. Mohamed Anas Dated: 11.06.2021 Page No. 9 of 21 2008 SC 441). The lapses or the irregularities in the investigation could be ignored only if despite their existence, the evidence on record bears out the case of the prosecution and evidence is of sterling quality.
Delhi District Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Case No. Sc/9512/2016 Ncb vs . Micheal Webuda Dated: 24.03.2021 Page ... on 24 March, 2021

In "Dalbir Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1987 SC 1328", no hard and fast rule can be laid down about the appreciation of evidence and every case has to be judged on the basis of its own facts. While appreciating the evidence of the witness, the approach must be whether the evidence of a witness read as a whole appears to have ring of truth. Once that impression is formed, it is undoubtedly, necessary for the court to scrutinize the evidence more particularly, keeping in view the deficiency, drawbacks and the infirmities pointed out in the evidence as a whole, and evaluate them to find out whether it is against the general tenor of evidence given by the witness as to render it unworthy of belief.
Delhi District Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Vijay @ Kale on 24 January, 2023

"17. In the above background, we shall now advert to the controversy at hand. For this purpose, it would be necessary to recapitulate the conclusions, arrived at by the Constitution Bench in Baldev Singh's Case(Supra). We are concerned with the following conclusions: "57. (1) That when an empowered officer or a duly authorised officer acting on prior information is about to search a person, it is imperative for him to inform the person concerned of his right under Sub-Section (1) of Section 50 of being taken to the nearest Gazetted Officer or the nearest Magistrate for making the search. However, such information may not necessarily be in writing."
Delhi District Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next