citedby: 7578423

Mact No.276/11 Raja Ram Prasad vs . Sultan & Others on 8 October, 2013

47. Ld. counsel for petitioner submitted that the present case is a case of amputation with 85% disability, therefore, petitioner has become entitled for compensation of Rs.3,00,000/ towards non pecuniary heads and placed his reliance on the decided case cited as Arun Sondhi Vs Delhi Transport Corporation, I (2001) ACC 615, and Siddhi Gopal Dixit @ Siddh Gopal Dixit Vs Siya Ram & Ors. MACT appeal no. 573/2009 decided on 03.03.2010.

Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mact No.999/08 Dev Singh vs . Khem Raj Yadav on 27 January, 2012

and also relied upon a decided case cited as Arun Sondhi Vs Delhi Transport Corporation, I (2001) ACC 615, and Siddhi Gopal Dixit @ Siddh Gopal Dixit Vs Siya Ram & Ors. MACT appeal no. 573/2009 decided on 03.03.2010, I carefully perused the observations given by their lordships in the 23 MACT NO.999/08 DEV SINGH VS. KHEM RAJ YADAV aforesaid decided case wherein it is observed as under:-

Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Sarita Vishnoi vs Gurjeet Singh S/O Sh. Manmohan Singh ... on 22 April, 2015

35.In Arun Sondhi Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, I (2001) ACC 615, and Siddhi Gopal Dixit @ Siddh Gopal Dixit Vs. Siya Ram & Ors. MACT appeal no. 573/2009 decided on 03.03.2010 and in case of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. V.S. Vijay Mittal, (2008) ACJ 1300, the Principles related to award of nonpecuniary compensation towards Pain and Suffering, Loss of Amenities of life and Disfiguration were discussed.

Delhi District Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Sarita Vishnoi vs Gurjeet Singh S/O Sh. Manmohan Singh ... on 22 April, 2015

35.In Arun Sondhi Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, I (2001) ACC 615, and Siddhi Gopal Dixit @ Siddh Gopal Dixit Vs. Siya Ram & Ors. MACT appeal no. 573/2009 decided on 03.03.2010 and in case of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. V.S. Vijay Mittal, (2008) ACJ 1300, the Principles related to award of nonpecuniary compensation towards Pain and Suffering, Loss of Amenities of life and Disfiguration were discussed.

Delhi District Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hari Pal S/O Sh. Jag Roop Singh vs ) Sh. Shiv Kumar S/O Sh. Shyam Lal on 10 April, 2012

In this regard the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble High Court in case titled Shiddhi Gopal Dixit Vs Siya Ram & Others reported in 2012 ACJ 165. Thus applying the formula given in these judgments, the monthly income of the petitioner can be held at Rs.5523/- (3682 + 50%).

Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

) Nitin S/O. Sh. Rewati Prasad vs ) Sh. Dharambir S/O. Sh. Chhotu Ram on 7 May, 2012

In this regard the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble High Court in case titled Shiddhi Gopal Dixit Vs Siya Ram & Others reported in 2012 ACJ 165. Thus applying the formula given in these judgments, the monthly income of the petitioner can be held at Rs. 4907/- (3271/- + 50%).

Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mact No.332/08, Girish Babu Gupta vs Om Kar Singh Etc. . on 10 May, 2012

and also relied upon a decided case cited as Arun Sondhi Vs Delhi Transport Corporation, I (2001) ACC 615, and Siddhi Gopal Dixit @ Siddh Gopal Dixit Vs Siya Ram & Ors. MACT appeal no. 573/2009 decided on 03.03.2010, I carefully perused the observations given by their lordships in the aforesaid decided case wherein it is observed as under:-

Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

) Hare Krishan Jha S/O. Late Sh. Mahavir ... vs ) Sh. Neeraj @ Khem Karan S/O. Sh. ... on 9 May, 2012

In this regard the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble High Court in case titled Shiddhi Gopal Dixit Vs Siya Ram & Others reported in 2012 ACJ 165. Thus applying the formula given in these judgments, the monthly income of the petitioner can be held at Rs. 3,600/- (3600/- + 50%).

Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Second Address : C/O. Kartar Singh Ka ... vs ) Sh. Lal Singh S/O. Sh. Mallah Singh on 17 May, 2012

In this regard the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble High Court in case titled Shiddhi Gopal Dixit Vs Siya Ram & Others reported in 2012 ACJ 165. Thus applying the formula given in these judgments, the monthly income of the petitioner can be held at Rs. 9,126/- (Rs. 6084/- + 50%).

Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Kulbir Singh vs Sh. Ramveer @ Ranbir Singh on 31 May, 2012

In this regard the petitioner has -14- relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble High Court in case titled Shiddhi Gopal Dixit Vs Siya Ram & Others reported in 2012 ACJ 165. Thus applying the formula given in these judgments, the monthly income of the petitioner can be held at Rs. 12,350/- (9,500 + 30%).

Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results