Smt Seetha S Shetty vs Mr B Vijayadas Adyanthaya on 29 January, 2020 iii) RAMANNA RAI & ANOTHER Vs. JAGANNATHA & OTHERS - AIR 1982 KAR 270; Karnataka High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 2 - N S Gowda - Full Document
Inas Aranha S/O Late Marku Aranha vs Shivayya Banga on 30 November, 2012 10. Learned counsel for the appellant has taken me through Sections 4, 7(2) and 30 of Hindu Succession Act and also Section 37-A of Madras Act. Referring to the judgments of the Apex Court in the case of (1) Sundari & others Vs Laxmi & others - AIR 1980 SC 198 and (2) Ramanna Rai & another vs Jagannatha & others - AIR 1982 Karnataka 270, he contends that the lower Appellate Court was in clear error in applying the provisions contained in Section 29(1) of the Madras Act. Karnataka High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - P B Sanganagouda - Full Document
Smt Rathnavathi vs Smt Saraswathi Adappa on 19 September, 2013 21. We have perused the judgments of the Apex Court in Sundari's Case and Ramanna Rai's Case cited supra, meticulously. We do not find any reason to accept the aforementioned submission of Sri Vishwajith Shetty. Karnataka High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
Smt V Chandu vs Sri V Panju on 15 January, 2021 2. AIR 1982 KAR 270 - RAMANNA RAI AND ANOTHER v. JAGANNATHA AND OTHERS. Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - J Mulimani - Full Document