Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.62 seconds)
Documents citing Md. Ansarul Haque Khan & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 12 July, 2018

Amresh Das vs The State Of Bihar And Anr on 26 February, 2019

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11778 of 2019(2) dt.26-02-2019 2/2 Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S Singh - Full Document

Hasib @ Md. Hasib vs The State Of Bihar on 14 May, 2019

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 21-12-2018. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25962 of 2019(3) dt.14-05-2019 2/2 Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Singh - Full Document

Md. Anwar vs The State Of Bihar on 22 July, 2019

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 07-03-2019. The offence is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44842 of 2019(2) dt.22-07-2019 2/2 Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Singh - Full Document

Shamsher Ansari vs The State Of Bihar on 13 December, 2021

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9933 of 2020(6) dt.13-12-2021 2/2 Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A K Sharan - Full Document

Md. Taukir Alam @ Tauqeer Alam vs The State Of Bihar on 13 December, 2021

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73091 of 2019(7) dt.13-12-2021 2/2 Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A K Sharan - Full Document

Prince Tiwari @ Prince Kumar Tiwari @ ... vs The State Of Bihar on 11 March, 2022

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner is husband of the victim. All the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10161 of 2022(2) dt.11-03-2022 2/2 Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Singh - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 11 March, 2022

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner is husband of the victim. All the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10168 of 2022(2) dt.11-03-2022 2/2 Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Singh - Full Document

Chandan Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 11 March, 2022

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner is husband of the victim. All the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11323 of 2022(2) dt.11-03-2022 2/2 Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S Singh - Full Document

Md. Nisad @ Md. Nisar Alam vs The State Of Bihar on 26 September, 2022

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has never made any dowry demand and has been falsely implicated in the present case mostly on suspicion and grudge. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21571 of 2022(4) dt.26-09-2022 2/3 Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A K Sharan - Full Document

Chunnu Kumar @ Chunnu Kumar Chaudhary vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 31 July, 2018

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46617 of 2018(2) dt.31-07-2018 2/2 Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next