The Calcutta Gujarati Education ... vs Sri Ajit Narayan Kapoor on 21 January, 2019
a) M/s. Sree Krishna Welding Works v. Amit Kumar
Chamaria & Anr. reported in (2015) 4 WBLR (Cal) 348;
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)M/S. Bankura Gas Distributors vs Dhirendra Nath Mallick on 7 December, 2015
Ld. Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 has submitted that initially on 01.9.1989, the Gas connection has been taken in Andhra Pradesh, where the Complainant used to work in the CISF and thereafter it has been transferred again and again on his transfer to different places, and not a single problem has arisen anywhere. Every formalities as called for by the OP No. 1 have been done. Still, the OP No. 1 is nonchalant and adamant not to provide him with the gas connection. The OP No. 2 has been introduced later on as an additional party. For non-inclusion of the IOCL, the case of the Complainant does not suffer, because it has no concern with the present dispute. He has been suffering for long for the harassment by the OP No. 1. He has relied upon a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Appeal (Civil) 4024/2013, in between Savita Garg Vs The Director, National Heart Institute, and a decision of the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in C.O. 1247/2015, in the case of M/s. Sree Krishna Welding Works Vs Amit Kumar Chamaria and Anr.
Rameshwar Jadav vs Ms. Sultana Abdullah And Others on 21 December, 2017
The learned counsel for the petitioner further cites another judgment of a co-ordinate
Bench of this Court reported at (2015) 4 WBLR 348 (Sree Krishna Welding Works Vs. Amit
Kumar Chamaria and others). In such judgment, same proposition was reiterated.
Rameshwar Jadav vs Ms. Sultana Abdullah And Others on 21 December, 2017
The learned counsel for the petitioner further cites another judgment of a co-ordinate
Bench of this Court reported at (2015) 4 WBLR 348 (Sree Krishna Welding Works Vs. Amit
Kumar Chamaria and others). In such judgment, same proposition was reiterated.
1