Raisa Begum ( Senior Citizen ) vs State And Ors on 21 November, 2023
Petition no. SC/133/2023 Raisa Begum Vs State & Ors. 4/4
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 69 (1.01 seconds)Documents citing
Raisa Begum And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 6 May, 1994
Saba.Rajendran vs Government Of Tamil Nadu on 13 February, 2019
(ii) In Raisa Begum v. State of U.P., reported in 1995
All.L.J. 534, the Allahabad High Court has held that certain
conditions have to be satisfied before a writ of mandamus is
issued. The petitioner for a writ of mandamus must show that
http://www.judis.nic.in
he has a legal right to compel the respondent to do or abstain
47
from doing something. There must be in the petitioner a right
to compel the performance of some duty cast on the
respondents. The duty sought to be enforced must have three
qualities. It must be a duty of public nature created by the
provisions of the Constitution or of a statute or some rule of
common law.
M.J.Shankar (Party-In-Person) vs The Director on 7 February, 2019
(ii) In Raisa Begum v. State of U.P., reported in 1995 All.L.J. 534,
the Allahabad High Court has held that certain conditions have to be
satisfied before a writ of mandamus is issued. The petitioner for a writ of
mandamus must show that he has a legal right to compel the respondent to
do or abstain from doing something. There must be in the petitioner a right
to compel the performance of some duty cast on the respondents. The
duty sought to be enforced must have three qualities. It must be a duty of
public nature created by the provisions of the Constitution or of a statute
or some rule of common law.
B.Ramkumar Adityan vs Secretary on 27 March, 2019
(ii) In Raisa Begum v. State of U.P., reported in 1995 All.L.J. 534, the
Allahabad High Court has held that certain conditions have to be satisfied
before a writ of mandamus is issued. The petitioner for a writ of mandamus
must show that he has a legal right to compel the respondent to do or abstain
from doing something. There must be in the petitioner a right to compel the
performance of some duty cast on the respondents. The duty sought to be
enforced must have three qualities. It must be a duty of public nature created
by the provisions of the Constitution or of a statute or some rule of common
law.
A.Ashvathaman vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 12 July, 2019
(ii) In Raisa Begum v. State of U.P., reported in 1995
All.L.J. 534, the Allahabad High Court has held that certain
conditions have to be satisfied before a writ of mandamus is
issued. The petitioner for a writ of mandamus must show that he
has a legal right to compel the respondent to do or abstain from
doing something. There must be in the petitioner a right to
compel the performance of some duty cast on the respondents.
The duty sought to be enforced must have three qualities. It must
be a duty of public nature created by the provisions of the
Constitution or of a statute or some rule of common law.
Kerala Pouravakasa Samrakshana ... vs Kerala State Human Rights Commission on 29 January, 2020
(e) In Raisa Begum v. State of U.P., reported in 1995 All.L.J. 534,
the Allahabad High Court has held that,-
C.L.Anto vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2020
(iii) In Raisa Begum v. State of U.P., reported in 1995 All.L.J.
534, the Allahabad High Court has held that certain conditions have
WP(C) No. 13775 of 2020 49
to be satisfied before a writ of mandamus is issued. The petitioner
for a writ of mandamus must show that he has a legal right to
compel the respondent to do or abstain from doing something.
There must be in the petitioner a right to compel the performance of
some duty cast on the respondents. The duty sought to be enforced
must have three qualities. It must be a duty of public nature created
by the provisions of the Constitution or of a statute or some rule of
common law.
T. Muhammed Faisi vs State Of Kerala on 29 July, 2020
(iii) In Raisa Begum v. State of U.P., reported in 1995 All.L.J.
534, the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court has held that certain
conditions have to be satisfied before a writ of mandamus is
issued. The petitioner for a writ of mandamus must show that he
has a legal right to compel the respondent to do or abstain from
doing something. There must be in the petitioner a right to
compel the performance of some duty cast on the respondents.
The duty sought to be enforced must have three qualities. It must
be a duty of public nature created by the provisions of the
Constitution or of a statute or some rule of common law.
Samastha Nair Samajam (Sns) vs State Of Kerala on 5 August, 2020
(iii) In Raisa Begum v. State of U.P., reported in 1995
All.L.J. 534, the Allahabad High Court has held that certain
conditions have to be satisfied before a writ of mandamus is
issued. The petitioner for a writ of mandamus must show that
he has a legal right to compel the respondent to do or abstain
from doing something. There must be in the petitioner a right
to compel the performance of some duty cast on the
respondents. The duty sought to be enforced must have three
qualities. It must be a duty of public nature created by the
provisions of the Constitution or of a statute or some rule of
common law.
Khadeeja Nargees vs State Of Kerala on 17 August, 2020
(iii) In Raisa Begum v. State of U.P., reported in 1995 All.L.J. 534,
the Allahabad High Court has held that certain conditions have to
be satisfied before a writ of mandamus is issued. The petitioner
for a writ of mandamus must show that he has a legal right to
compel the respondent to do or abstain from doing something.
There must be in the petitioner a right to compel the performance
of some duty cast on the respondents. The duty sought to be
enforced must have three qualities. It must be a duty of public
nature created by the provisions of the Constitution or of a statute
or some rule of common law.