Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 60 (3.62 seconds)
Documents citing Bharat Petroleum Corp.Ltd vs Chembur Service Station on 2 March, 2011

Smt. Kusum vs Sh. Raj Singh on 20 November, 2018

The important recent judgment of the hon'ble Supreme Court on the distinction between lease and licence is  Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd. vs. Chembur Service Station wherein the Court observed that Licenses can   be   of   different   kinds.   Some   licenses   with   reference   to   use   of immovable   property   may   be   very   wide,   virtually   bordering   upon leases. Some licenses can be very­very narrow, giving a mere right enabling a person to visit a premises ­ say a museum or a lecture hall or an exhibition. In between are the licenses of  different hues and degrees. All licenses cannot be treated on the same footing.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Parbati vs Sh. Raj Singh on 10 December, 2018

The important recent judgment of the hon'ble Supreme Court on the distinction between lease and licence is  Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd. vs. Chembur Service Station wherein the Court observed that Licenses can   be   of   different   kinds.   Some   licenses   with   reference   to   use   of immovable   property   may   be   very   wide,   virtually   bordering   upon leases. Some licenses can be very­very narrow, giving a mere right enabling a person to visit a premises ­ say a museum or a lecture hall or an exhibition. In between are the licenses of  different hues and degrees. All licenses cannot be treated on the same footing.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Frigorifico Allana Private Limited vs East Delhi Municipal Corporation on 24 February, 2021

The said dicta has been consistently followed by the Supreme Court and by this Court in Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Sriman Narayan (2002) 5 SCC 760, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs. Chembur Service Station (2011) 3 SCC 710, National Auto Impex Vs. Autocop (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2001) 93 DLT 74, Raj Electricals Regd. Vs. B.S.E.S Rajdhani Power Ltd. 2007 SCC OnLine Del 1480 (DB), Kumar Service Station Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. 2009 SCC OnLine Del 1521, Sannil Sethi Vs. Punjabi Bagh Club (Regd.) 2009 SCC OnLine Del 2810, MSM Discovery Private Limited Vs. Union of India 2010 SCC OnLine Del FAO(OS) (COMM) 34/2021 & FAO(OS) (COMM) 33/2021 Page 6 of 9 4545, VF Service (UK) Limited Vs. Union of India 2011 SCC OnLine Del 4858, Moti Ram & Company Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. 2011 SCC OnLine Del 2863, Kashyap's Vs. Bata India Ltd. 2013 SCC OnLine Del 2424, Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. RK Mahajan (2015) 225 DLT 484 (DB), Captain Guman Singh & Sons Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. 2016 SCC OnLine Del 983 and Shri Sai Nath Enterprises Vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporation 2016 SCC OnLine Del 814.
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Rajesh Gupta vs Smt. Urvashi Marwaha on 19 June, 2012

8. Recently in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Chembur Service  Station : (2011) 3 SCC 710, the Supreme Court affirms following principles  culled   out   from   the   judicial   opinion   reflected   in   Errington   v.   Errington  (1952) All E.R. 149, (i) to ascertain whether a document creates a licence or  lease, the substance of the document must be preferred to the form; (ii)  the real test is the intention of the parties ­ whether they intended to create  a lease or a licence; (iii) if the document creates an interest in the property,  it is a lease; but, if it only permits another to make use of the property, of  which the legal possession continues with the owner, it is a licence; and (4)  if under the document a party gets exclusive possession of the property,  prima facie, he is considered to be a tenant; but circumstances may be  established which negative the intention to create a lease.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Rajmata Padmini Devi W/O Late Sh. ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 September, 2023

Learned senior counsel for the applicants has placed reliance upon the following judgments:- (1) M/s. Lakhara and Co. Vs M/s. Shivakaran bhanwar lal kila reported in air 1995 rajasthan 17; (2) vidya devi Vs state of himachal pradesh and others reported in (2020) 2 supreme court cases 569; (3) kesar bai vs genda lal and another reported in (2022) 10 supreme court cases 217; (4) baini prasad (d) thro' (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 08:03:36 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:22692] (5 of 10) [CMA-2109/2023] LR's. Vs durga devi reported in 2023(1) DNJ (sc) 78; (5) Maria Margarida Sequeira Fernandes and others vs Erasmo Jack De Sequeira (dead) through Lrs.reported in (2012) 5 supreme court cases 370; (6) Behram Tejani and Others vs Azeem Jagani reported in (2017) 2 supreme court cases 759; (7) Dnyaneshwar Ranganath Bhandare & anr. Vs Sadhu Dadu Shettigar (Shetty) & ANR. Reported in 2012(1) WLC (SC) Civil 160; (8) Joseph Severance & Ors. Vs Benny Mathew & Ors. Reported in 2005(6) Supreme 516; (9) Panchugopal Barua and others Vs Umesh Chandra Goswami and others reported in AIR 1997 Supreme Court 1041; (10) Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs Chembur service station reported in 2276/2011-Decided on 2.3.2011 (11) Sant Lal Jain Vs Avtar Singh reported in 1985 Supreme Court 857; (12) M. P. Irrigation Karamchari Sangh Vs State of M.P. reported in AIR 1985 Supreme Court 860; (13) Jagdish Vs Shri Girdhari Lal Sharma & ors. Reported in 2022 (5) WLC 90 (Raj.) (14) Municipal Council, Bhilwara Thro' Its Commissioner & Anr. Vs Sarika Chaplot & Ors. Reported in 2022(4) DNJ (Raj.) 1441; (15) Sirajuddin @ Vajir Miyan Vs Abdul Gaffar & Ors. Reported in 2015(1) WLC (Raj.) 448; (16) Bhagwati Singh Vs Raja Laxman Singh reported in 2014 WLC (Raj.) UC 246; (17) Rajeshwer Shankar Choudhary @ Rajesh Choudhary & Anr. Vs Shiv Shankar Choudhary & Ors. Reported in 2013 WLC (Raj.) UC 556; (18) Niranjan Singh & Anr. Vs Rajesh Kumar reported in WLC (Raj.) UC 426; (19) Representative Aam Janta, Village Berdo ka Bas & Anr. Vs Gramin Vikas Vigyan Samiti, (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 08:03:36 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:22692] (6 of 10) [CMA-2109/2023] Jelu Gagadi & Ors. Reported in 2006(1) DNJ (Raj.) 421; (20) Jai Singh Vs Kuldeep sharma & Anr. Reported in 2013(4) DNJ (Raj.) 1501; (21) Maharwal Khewaji Trust (Regd.) faridkot Vs Baldev Dass reported in AIR 2005 Supreme Court 104; (22) Vinod Kumar Sharma & Anr. Vs Narendra Kumar & Ors. Reported in S.B. Miscellaneous Appeal No. 6413/2016 decided on 03/07/2017; (23) Ramsharan Gupta S/o Shri Suraj Narain Khandelwal (Gupta) Vs Krishan Kumar Agarwal @ Kishan Kumar Agarwal reported in 2022 (7) WLC 407 (Raj.); (24) Peer Gulam Naseer Vs Peer Gulam Jelanee S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 657 of 1986, decided on 28.10.1988; (25) Satish Kumar Pareek Vs The state of Rajasthan & Ors. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7133/2004 (PIL) decided on 5 th May, 2008.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - N S Dhaddha - Full Document

Rajmata Padmini Devi W/O Late Maharaja ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 September, 2023

Learned senior counsel for the applicants has placed reliance upon the following judgments:- (1) M/s. Lakhara and Co. Vs M/s. Shivakaran bhanwar lal kila reported in air 1995 rajasthan 17; (2) vidya devi Vs state of himachal pradesh and others reported in (2020) 2 supreme court cases 569; (3) kesar bai vs genda lal and another reported in (2022) 10 supreme court cases 217; (4) baini prasad (d) thro' LR's. Vs durga devi reported in 2023(1) DNJ (sc) 78; (5) Maria Margarida Sequeira Fernandes and others vs Erasmo Jack De Sequeira (dead) through Lrs.reported in (2012) 5 supreme court cases 370; (6) Behram Tejani and Others vs Azeem Jagani reported in (2017) 2 supreme court cases (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 08:03:38 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:22346] (5 of 10) [CMA-2110/2023] 759; (7) Dnyaneshwar Ranganath Bhandare & anr. Vs Sadhu Dadu Shettigar (Shetty) & ANR. Reported in 2012(1) WLC (SC) Civil 160; (8) Joseph Severance & Ors. Vs Benny Mathew & Ors. Reported in 2005(6) Supreme 516; (9) Panchugopal Barua and others Vs Umesh Chandra Goswami and others reported in AIR 1997 Supreme Court 1041; (10) Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs Chembur service station reported in 2276/2011-Decided on 2.3.2011 (11) Sant Lal Jain Vs Avtar Singh reported in 1985 Supreme Court 857; (12) M. P. Irrigation Karamchari Sangh Vs State of M.P. reported in AIR 1985 Supreme Court 860; (13) Jagdish Vs Shri Girdhari Lal Sharma & ors. Reported in 2022 (5) WLC 90 (Raj.) (14) Municipal Council, Bhilwara Thro' Its Commissioner & Anr. Vs Sarika Chaplot & Ors. Reported in 2022(4) DNJ (Raj.) 1441; (15) Sirajuddin @ Vajir Miyan Vs Abdul Gaffar & Ors. Reported in 2015(1) WLC (Raj.) 448; (16) Bhagwati Singh Vs Raja Laxman Singh reported in 2014 WLC (Raj.) UC 246; (17) Rajeshwer Shankar Choudhary @ Rajesh Choudhary & Anr. Vs Shiv Shankar Choudhary & Ors. Reported in 2013 WLC (Raj.) UC 556; (18) Niranjan Singh & Anr. Vs Rajesh Kumar reported in WLC (Raj.) UC 426; (19) Representative Aam Janta, Village Berdo ka Bas & Anr. Vs Gramin Vikas Vigyan Samiti, Jelu Gagadi & Ors. Reported in 2006(1) DNJ (Raj.) 421; (20) Jai Singh Vs Kuldeep sharma & Anr. Reported in 2013(4) DNJ (Raj.) 1501; (21) Maharwal Khewaji Trust (Regd.) faridkot Vs Baldev Dass reported in AIR 2005 Supreme Court 104; (22) Vinod Kumar Sharma & Anr. Vs (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 08:03:38 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:22346] (6 of 10) [CMA-2110/2023] Narendra Kumar & Ors. Reported in S.B. Miscellaneous Appeal No. 6413/2016 decided on 03/07/2017; (23) Ramsharan Gupta S/o Shri Suraj Narain Khandelwal (Gupta) Vs Krishan Kumar Agarwal @ Kishan Kumar Agarwal reported in 2022 (7) WLC 407 (Raj.); (24) Peer Gulam Naseer Vs Peer Gulam Jelanee S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 657 of 1986, decided on 28.10.1988; (25) Satish Kumar Pareek Vs The state of Rajasthan & Ors. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7133/2004 (PIL) decided on 5 th May, 2008.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - N S Dhaddha - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next