Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18893 (4.97 seconds)
Documents citing Chandrappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka on 15 February, 2007

Central Bureau Of Investigation vs A Raja & Ors on 22 March, 2024

203. Ms. Rebecca John, learned senior counsel for respondent No. 17 submitted that the Appellate court shall not normally interfere with the findings recorded by the Ld. Trial Court unless it is perverse or illegal on the very face of it. In regard to the double presumption of innocence, learned counsel has relied upon Chandrappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka (supra) and Jafarudheen vs. State of Kerala148.
Delhi High Court Cites 132 - Cited by 0 - D K Sharma - Full Document

The State Of Gujarat vs Pradeep Amarsinh @ Amubhai Parmar & on 31 January, 2017

7. On the first issue, the legal principles regarding powers of the appellate Court while dealing with an appeal against an order of acquittal, have been reiterated by this Court in Page 27 of 34 HC-NIC Page 27 of 34 Created On Thu Feb 02 05:42:22 IST 2017 R/CR.A/1392/2006 CAV JUDGMENT a catena of cases. This Court culled down five general principles in Chandrappa and Ors. vs. State of Karnataka, (2007) 4 SCC 415, as follows:
Gujarat High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - S R Brahmbhatt - Full Document

State Of Gujarat vs Dahyabhai Motibhai Rathod on 20 January, 2023

28. This Court in Chandrappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka, (2007) 4 SCC 415, highlighted that there is one significant difference in exercising power while hearing an appeal against acquittal by the appellate court. The appellate court would not interfere where the judgment impugned is based on evidence and the view taken was reasonable and plausible. This is because the appellate court will determine the fact that there is presumption in favour of the accused and the accused is entitled to get the benefit of doubt but if it decides to interfere it should assign reasons for differing with the decision of acquittal.
Gujarat High Court Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - V M Pancholi - Full Document

State Of Gujarat vs Ahir Hamirbhai Mulubhai on 1 February, 2023

28. This Court in Chandrappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka, (2007) 4 SCC 415, highlighted that there is one significant difference in exercising power while hearing an appeal against acquittal by the appellate court. The appellate court would not interfere where the Page 39 of 47 Downloaded on : Sun Sep 17 21:22:44 IST 2023 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.A/625/1996 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/02/2023 undefined judgment impugned is based on evidence and the view taken was reasonable and plausible. This is because the appellate court will determine the fact that there is presumption in favour of the accused and the accused is entitled to get the benefit of doubt but if it decides to interfere it should assign reasons for differing with the decision of acquittal.
Gujarat High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 0 - V M Pancholi - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next