Kolluru Kailash Kumar vs The State Of Telangana And 2 Others on 8 January, 2020
8.5 He would submit that all objections filed by the individuals
and public representatives were considered and suitable replies were
furnished. He would emphasize that wherever there was requirement to
afford an opportunity of hearing, same was provided. That all objections
were duly taken note and wherever it is necessary the mistakes pointed
18 PNRJ
WPs 29058/19 & 29133/19
out were rectified. Learned Additional Advocate General in support of
his contention that writ petitions are not maintainable, placed reliance
on decision of this Court in Jandrajupalli Purushotham Vs District
Collector, Prakasam district8 (paragraph 14)
8.6. According to learned Additional Advocate General, as per
Article 243 ZG, every order/ decision relating to conducting of elections
to the local bodies is law and after election process was set in
notification on 23.12.2019, writ petitions are not maintainable.