Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (1.86 seconds)
Documents citing M/S.Bio Research Pharmaceuticals vs State Bank Of Travancore on 21 January, 2015

M/S Matha Pharma vs The State Bank Of India on 16 December, 2024

24. The decisions in Bio Research Pharmaceuticals (supra) and Paramsivam (supra) only establish that the phrase "as far as possible" in Section 29 of the RDDB Act does not mean that the provisions of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act need not be followed at all or can be deviated from at the whims and fancies of the Recovery Officer. In other words, both decisions only hold that where such provisions are in tune with the Scheme of the RDDB Act, they must be followed without departure.
Kerala High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - D K Singh - Full Document

Levakumar V.S vs The South Indian Bank Ltd., Represented ... on 16 December, 2024

24. The decisions in Bio Research Pharmaceuticals (supra) and Paramsivam (supra) only establish that the phrase "as far as possible" in Section 29 of the RDDB Act does not mean that the provisions of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act need not be followed at all or can be deviated from at the whims and fancies of the Recovery Officer. In other words, both decisions only hold that where such provisions are in tune with the Scheme of the RDDB Act, they must be followed without departure.
Kerala High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - D K Singh - Full Document

Canara Bank vs The Recovery Officer on 16 December, 2024

24. The decisions in Bio Research Pharmaceuticals (supra) and Paramsivam (supra) only establish that the phrase "as far as possible" in Section 29 of the RDDB Act does not mean that the provisions of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act need not be followed at all or can be deviated from at the whims and fancies of the Recovery Officer. In other words, both decisions only hold that where such provisions are in tune with the Scheme of the RDDB Act, they must be followed without departure.
Kerala High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - D K Singh - Full Document

Geevarghese P. John vs The Federal Bank Ltd on 16 December, 2024

24. The decisions in Bio Research Pharmaceuticals (supra) and Paramsivam (supra) only establish that the phrase "as far as possible" in Section 29 of the RDDB Act does not mean that the provisions of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act need not be followed at all or can be deviated from at the whims and fancies of the Recovery Officer. In other words, both decisions only hold that where such provisions are in tune with the Scheme of the RDDB Act, they must be followed without departure.
Kerala High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - D K Singh - Full Document
1