Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1314 (0.79 seconds)
Documents citing Samar Ghosh vs Jaya Ghosh on 26 March, 2007

Pranay Kumar Kundu vs Smt. Rupanjana Kundu on 15 February, 2019

The wife, in the instant case, was taken to Shimla on 19.4.13 for honeymoon purpose when, she was put to suffer cruelty, already discussed. Such type of treatment, extended to wife, was not only abnormal, but contrary to ordinary course human conduct, being reprehensible and censored, because during honeymoon period, may be for brief period, a married couple will be expected to carry all vibrancy of life with full blossom and enthusiasm. The subsequent conduct of appellant/husband meted out to wife after she was brought to her Uttarpara residence was not only abnormal but unbecoming also. The Apex Court while setting out certain illustrative examples of mental cruelty in the case of Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh (supra) noticed also the case Vinita Sexena v. Pankaj Pandit reported in (2006)3 SCC 778.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 21 - Cited by 1 - I P Mukerji - Full Document

Smt. Babita Kumari vs Ramesh Kumar on 27 April, 2016

In the case in hand the husband has made allegation regarding mental and, to some extent, physical torture. He has led Patna High Court MA No.188 of 2011 27/27 evidence as stated above and has been able to prove it. The wife has also made allegation of cruelty against the husband but has failed to examine her as witness to support her pleading. Thus, on account of mental cruelty also there is no requirement of interfering with the judgment and the decree of the Family Court. On that count also, in view of the observations of the Apex Court in Samar Ghosh (supra), it has to be held that on consideration of complete matrimonial life of the parties, acute mental pain, agony and suffering as stated by both of them is of such magnitude that it would not be possible for the parties to live with each other, thus, it would also come within the broad parameters of mental cruelty.
Patna High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - R Ranjan - Full Document

Kamalika Majumdar Nee Das vs Subhapriya Majumdar on 11 June, 2025

This aligns squarely with the broader understanding of mental cruelty, as meticulously elaborated in Samar Ghosh vs. Jaya Ghosh (particularly paragraphs 45-50), which defines mental cruelty as continuous ill- treatment or circumstances rendering cohabitation impossible due to the other party's conduct, a definition that undeniably encompasses fundamental deception about one's marital status. Moreover, this profound deceit casts significant doubt on the husband's credibility and his moral standing to seek a divorce decree from this Court. The husband has failed to prove that he had disclosed about such earlier marital relationships to the appellant/wife.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - S Bhattacharyya - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next