Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing Kirorimal Kashiram Marketing And ... vs Shri Ravinder Kumar Khanna Trading As ... on 19 March, 2008

Indospirit Marketing Pvt. Ltd vs Mr. Ravinder Kumar on 21 January, 2023

In the present case, upon perusal of invoices Ex PW1/3 (Colly) placed on record shows that the goods (alcoholic beverages) have been sold CS (Comm) 781/22 Indospirit Marketing Pvt. Vs. Ravinder Kumar page 5 of 7 by the plaintiff to one Ravinder Kumar. Even statement of account Ex PW1/2 from the books of account of plaintiff placed on record showing the outstanding balance shows the name of buyer Ravinder Kumar. It is no more res integra that these invoices are akin to contracts between the parties making parties liable to each other. Therefore, in view of discussion above, the plaintiff is entitled to recover unpaid amount from defendant.
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Kirorimal Kashiram Marketing And ... vs M/S Sachdeva & Sons Industries Pvt. Ltd. on 11 December, 2008

9. The decision of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board in Kirorimal Kashiram Mktg. & Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ravinder Kumar Khanna 2008 (37) PTC 654, again relating to the plaintiff has also come to my notice. Therein also the opposition of the plaintiff herein to the mark K.C. Double Deer Brand in respect of Cardamom was rejected inter-alia on the ground of Double Deer being ordinary English word to which none can claim monopoly and being incapable of distinguishing the goods of the plaintiff herein. It was also held there was no phonetic or visual resemblance in the two marks. Yet another reason was the difference in nature of goods with respect to which the two marks were to be used.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 8 - R S Endlaw - Full Document
1