Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (1.19 seconds)Documents citing
Mumtaz Begum & Ors. vs Mohd. Khan on 12 January, 2010
Praveen & Anr vs Mulak Raj & Ors on 6 December, 2023
I
have also in judgment dated 12th January, 2009 in RC (R)
No.78-79/2005 titled Mumtaz Begum Vs. Mohd. Khan held that
non-disclosure of other accommodation available is not always
fatal.
Mrs. Usha Bhatia vs The Amritsar Transport Company (Pvt.) ... on 23 July, 2018
In the case of Mumtaz Begum v.
Mohd. Khan (supra) it has been held that nothing wrong can be found
with the choice express by the landlords in opting to evict tenants from
the tenanted premises rather than opting to occupy property which is far
away, even if held to be available to the landlords. There is a rationale in
the choice exercised by the landlord for the premise close to their existing
accommodation rather than far away.
Sh. Opender Nath Ahuja vs Sh. Sanjay Chug on 29 November, 2012
In view of the discussion above I am of the consider view that the fact
which is alleged to be concealed in leave to defend application i.e. other
E No. 312/11 Page 11 of 22
property cannot be considered as such concealment of fact as well as
petitioner/landlord has not approached with the clean hands in view of
judgment i.e. Mumtaj Begum and Ors. Vs. Mohd. Khan in RC (R) Nos.
Kanta Sharma vs Sanjay Sharma on 25 November, 2021
In the case of Mumtaz Begum Vs. Mohd. Khan RCR No. 78-79/2005
dated 12.01.2009, it was held that non-disclosure of other accommodation
available is always not fatal. In the present case, the respondent has failed
to establish that the petitioner has other reasonably suitable
accommodation for her requirements. As such, even if the petitioner has
failed to disclose about any of the properties that she owns, such alleged
non-disclosure, not being a material fact since the alternative properties
are not reasonably suitable for the stated purpose, is inconsequential.
S. Amolak Singh Correct Name Amolak Raj ... vs Narender Kumar Dang on 3 November, 2017
I have also in
judgment dated 12th January, 2009 in RC (R) No.78-79/2005 titled Mumtaz
Begum Vs. Mohd. Khan held that non-disclosure of other accommodation
available is not always fatal.
Sh. Karan Kumar vs Sh. Chattar Singh Singhi on 8 May, 2018
In the case of Mumtaz Begum Vs. Mohd. Khan
RCR No. 78-79/2005 dated 12.01.2009, it was held that non-disclosure of
other accommodation available is not always fatal. Therefore, even if the
petitioner did not disclose details of other properties owned by him, the same
cannot alone be a reason for dismissing the present petition.
Eviction Petition M. No.18/12 Miraj ... vs . Sh. Mohd. Sharif on 20 March, 2018
In the case of Mumtaz Begum Vs. Mohd. Khan
RCR No. 78-79/2005 dated 12.01.2009, it was held that non-disclosure of
other accommodation available is always not fatal. Therefore, even if the
petitioner did not disclose details of other properties owned by him, the same
cannot be a reason for dismissing the present petition.
Eviction Petition No. E-298/13 vs Sh. Vinod Kumar on 4 April, 2018
Eviction Petition No. E-300/13 vs Sh. Joginder Singh Arora on 5 April, 2018
In the case of Mumtaz Begum Vs.
Mohd. Khan RCR No. 78-79/2005 dated 12.01.2009, it was held that non-
disclosure of other accommodation available is always not fatal. In the present
case, the respondent has failed to establish that the petitioner has other
reasonably suitable accommodation for her requirements. As such, even if the
petitioner has failed to disclose about any of the properties that she owns,
such alleged non-disclosure, not being a material fact, is inconsequential.