Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.51 seconds)

Abdul Rahiman vs State Of Kerala on 16 January, 2004

In the decision reported in Abdul Fakirsaheb Mamtule v. State of Maharashtra (2001 Crl.L.J 3396) the Bombay High Court observed that if the witnesses have Crl.A.Nos.114 & 135 of 2004 10 admittedly received fake notes from accused, fake notes were recovered from the possession of the accused, then it can be presumed that or it can be inferred that the accused had reason to believe that notes in possession were fake.
Kerala High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1) Kuldeep Sharma on 10 April, 2007

In the case of Abdul Fakirsaheb Mamtule Vs. State of Maharashtra; 2001 Crl. L.J. 3396, accused was found in possession of 17 fake currency notes of 100 rupee denomination. Ld. Trial Court had sentenced the accused to undergo RI for 7 years each for the offences punishable under sections 489-B and 489C IPC. In view of the fact that the accused was an old man of 73 years when the appeal came up for hearing, the sentence was reduced to SI for 3 years each for the offence U/s 489-B and 489C of IPC.
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1