Abdul Rahiman vs State Of Kerala on 16 January, 2004
In the decision reported in Abdul Fakirsaheb
Mamtule v. State of Maharashtra (2001 Crl.L.J 3396) the
Bombay High Court observed that if the witnesses have
Crl.A.Nos.114 & 135 of 2004 10
admittedly received fake notes from accused, fake notes were
recovered from the possession of the accused, then it can be
presumed that or it can be inferred that the accused had reason
to believe that notes in possession were fake.