Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing Seema Alias Preeti vs Pramod Chandrakant Vernekar on 23 June, 2004

Smt. Seema vs Pramod on 22 April, 2016

6 Although, the orders passed by Ld. Trial court cannot be termed as illegal or irregular on technical basis but the purpose of the law is to meet the ends of justice and the technicalities of law must not come in the way of substantive justice. Clearly, several opportunities have been given to the petitioner to lead her evidence but petitioner failed to lead her evidence but in my opinion, there is requirement of providing further opportunity to the petitioner to prove her case in the interest of justice. Moreover no prejudice shall be caused to the respondent as they will have the CR No. 212/3/15 Seema vs. Pramod & Ors PAGE No. 3/4 opportunity to rebut the testimony of complainant/petitioner by conducting cross­examination or by leading their own positive evidence. At the same time, in view of the conduct of the petitioner before the ld. Trial court, I am of the view that she is liable to be burdened with cost as she failed to lead her evidence despite various opportunities.
Delhi District Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt Sandhya H R vs Sri Karthik B S on 20 September, 2018

In the case of Seema alias Preeti vs. Pramod Chandrakant Vernekar, (2004(4) KLJ 572) this Court, following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sumita Singh vs. Kumar Sanjay and another (AIR 2002 SC 396) has held that 7 while considering the application for transfer of matrimonial proceedings under the provisions of Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the convenience of the wife has to be looked into and accordingly, this Court has allowed the transfer petition filed by the wife".
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - B Veerappa - Full Document

Smt. Greeshma Gurudath Pai vs Mahesh M. Kamath on 20 September, 2018

In the case of Seema alias Preeti vs. Pramod Chandrakant Vernekar, (2004(4) KLJ 572) this Court, following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sumita Singh vs. Kumar Sanjay and another (AIR 2002 SC 396) has held that while considering the application for transfer of matrimonial proceedings under the provisions of Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the convenience of the wife has to be looked into and accordingly, this Court has allowed the transfer petition filed by the wife".
Karnataka High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - B Veerappa - Full Document

Smt R Hema vs Sri H R Sharath on 18 September, 2018

In the case of Seema alias Preeti vs. Pramod Chandrakant Vernekar, (2004(4) KLJ 572) this Court, following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sumita Singh vs. Kumar Sanjay and another (AIR 2002 SC 396) has held that while considering the application for transfer of matrimonial proceedings under the provisions of Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the convenience of the wife has to be looked into and accordingly, this Court has allowed the transfer petition filed by the wife".
Karnataka High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - B Veerappa - Full Document

Soumyashree D/O Late Prahalad M ... vs Narshima Parvatikar S/O Raghavendra ... on 2 March, 2018

8. This Court while considering the petition under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, in the case of Seema Alias Preeti vs Promod Chandrakant Vernekar, reported in 2004(4) Kar.L.J.572, relying upon the dictum of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay and another, reported in AIR 2002 S.C. 396, has held that while considering the application for transfer of matrimonial proceedings, the convenience of the wife has to be looked into while passing the orders under Section 24 of Code of Civil procedure.
Karnataka High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - B Veerappa - Full Document

Preeti@Priayadarshini vs Revansiddayya on 2 March, 2018

8. This Court while considering the petition under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, in the case of Seema Alias Preeti vs Promod Chandrakant Vernekar, reported in 2004(4) Kar.L.J.572, relying upon the dictum of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay and another, reported in AIR 2002 S.C. 396, has held that while considering the application for transfer of matrimonial proceedings, the convenience of the wife has to be 7 looked into while passing the orders under Section 24 of Code of Civil procedure.
Karnataka High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - B Veerappa - Full Document

Smt.Shruti Devkar W/O Sanjay H.S. vs H.S.Sanjay S/O B.H.Siddappa on 8 March, 2018

9. My view is fortified by the dictum of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of Seema Alias Preeti vs Promod Chandrakant Vernekar, reported in 2004(4) Kar.L.J.572, relying upon the dictum of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay and another, reported in AIR 2002 S.C. 396, has held that while considering the application for transfer of matrimonial proceedings, the convenience of the wife has to be looked into while passing the orders under Section 24 of Code of Civil procedure.
Karnataka High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - B Veerappa - Full Document

Smt. Amisha. S vs Yashvanth H on 18 September, 2018

In the case of Seema alias Preeti vs. Pramod Chandrakant Vernekar, (2004(4) KLJ 572) this Court, following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sumita Singh vs. Kumar Sanjay and another (AIR 2002 SC 396) has held that while considering the application for transfer of matrimonial proceedings under the 6 provisions of Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the convenience of the wife has to be looked into and accordingly, this Court has allowed the transfer petition filed by the wife".
Karnataka High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - B Veerappa - Full Document

Smt. Budemma @ Laksmidevi vs Sri. Ramachandra on 2 March, 2018

8. This Court while considering the petition under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, in the case of Seema Alias Preeti vs Promod Chandrakant 6 Vernekar, reported in 2004(4) Kar.L.J.572, relying upon the dictum of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay and another, reported in AIR 2002 S.C. 396, has held that while considering the application for transfer of matrimonial proceedings, the convenience of the wife has to be looked into while passing the orders under Section 24 of Code of Civil procedure.
Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - B Veerappa - Full Document
1   2 Next