citedby: 7701729

1 - 5 of 5 (0.59 seconds)

Documents citing Managing Director M/S Gtm Teleshopping ... vs Joint Commissioner (Legal) Central ... on 10 February, 2017

Anupama Ayurvedic Drug Company Private ... vs Kolkata-V on 26 February, 2026

• GTM Teleshopping Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE [2017(6) GSTL 313 (Tri-Del)] [Affirmed in 2018 (18) GSTL 227 (M.P. HC)] G. The demand is vitiated on account of an error in quantification.

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anupama Ayurvedic Drug Company Private ... vs Kolkata-Iii on 26 February, 2026

• GTM Teleshopping Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE [2017(6) GSTL 313 (Tri-Del)] [Affirmed in 2018 (18) GSTL 227 (M.P. HC)] G. The demand is vitiated on account of an error in quantification.

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ratnendu Bikash Tripathi vs Kolkata-Iii on 26 February, 2026

• GTM Teleshopping Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE [2017(6) GSTL 313 (Tri-Del)] [Affirmed in 2018 (18) GSTL 227 (M.P. HC)] G. The demand is vitiated on account of an error in quantification.

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ratnendu Bikash Tripathi vs Kolkata-V on 26 February, 2026

• GTM Teleshopping Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE [2017(6) GSTL 313 (Tri-Del)] [Affirmed in 2018 (18) GSTL 227 (M.P. HC)] G. The demand is vitiated on account of an error in quantification.

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anupama Ayurvedic Drug Company Pvt Ltd vs Kolkata North Commissionerate on 26 February, 2026

• GTM Teleshopping Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE [2017(6) GSTL 313 (Tri-Del)] [Affirmed in 2018 (18) GSTL 227 (M.P. HC)] G. The demand is vitiated on account of an error in quantification.

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

1