Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing Wellman Wacoma Limited vs Tivoli Park Apartments Private Limited ... on 7 September, 2009

R.P. Techvision (I) Private Limited vs Official Liquidator & Anr on 16 December, 2014

In reply Mr. S.N. Mookherjee, learned Senior Advocate strenuously argued that the contention of the respondent no. 2 that the appellant is estopped from challenging the said the first order dated May 14, 2013, is misconceived and none of the said decisions in the cases Bihar Biri Leaves Co. (Supra) and Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. (Supra) has any application in the instant case. Mr. Mookherjee submitted that the right of the appellant to prefer an appeal against the said order dated May 14, 2013 is a statutory right under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956 and there cannot be any estoppel when statutory rights and liabilities are involved.
Calcutta High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A K Banerjee - Full Document

Bangur Brothers Limited (In ... vs Unknown on 27 February, 2015

In the context of the authority available to the company court to pass an order of eviction, the lessor has referred to the judgments reported at 67 Comp Cas 394 (Vidyadhar Upadhyay v. Madan Gopal Jew), 143 Comp Cas 563 (Tata Steel Limited v. Official Liquidator), (2011) 3 CHN 193 (Birla Corporation Limited v. Basant Properties Limited), (2012) 4 CHN 645 (Wellman Wacoma Limited v. Tivoli Park Apartments (P) Limited) and (2001) 8 SCC 187 (Biswanath Poddar v. Archana Poddar).
Calcutta High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - S Banerjee - Full Document

M/S. Bharat Brakes & Valves Ltd. (In ... vs The O/L on 6 January, 2023

10. In this background, the continued possession of the company (in liquidation) or the Official Liquidator in any portion of the premises would be burdensome and against the interests of the company (in liquidation). The premises is burdened with onerous covenants and would attract a monetary claim which would not support in the beneficial winding up of the company (in liquidation). There is no rival claim in respect of the premises. (Wellman Wacoma Ltd. Vs. Tivoli Park Apartments (P) Ltd. (2012) 116 SCL 46, Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd Vs Official Liquidator.
Calcutta High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R K Kapur - Full Document
1