Nanu @ Mamchand vs State Of Up And 13 Others on 28 April, 2026
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. was filed by the petitioner before the learned CJM, Saharanpur alleging therein that 14 accused persons, including two Lekhpals, one Kanoongo and one Naib Tehsildar, encroached upon his Gata Nos.251, 757M by constructing a passage upon it. He submitted that entire facts and allegations were properly disclosed in his application and those allegations, prima facie, constitute an offence. However, his application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. was dismissed by the learned CJM by order dated 18.1.2023. Aggrieved by the order dated 18.1.2023, the petitioner preferred Criminal Revision No.50 of 2023 (Nanu @ Mamchand vs. State of U.P. & Ors.). However, said criminal revision was also dismissed on 2.7.2024 without considering the gravity of allegations disclosed in his application. It was submitted that both courts have committed gross illegality in disbelieving the allegations mentioned in his application.