Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.30 seconds)

Srinivasan vs The Commissioner on 28 June, 2023

In L.LOGANATHAN Vs. THE COMMISSIONER, UDHAGAMANDALAM MUNICIPALITY, UDHAGAMANDALAM, NILGIRIS (W.P.No.10262 of 2020), the learned Single Judge of this Court extensively considered the Master Plan and Development Control Rules applicable to the Hill areas and also considering the Rule 7 (2) had directed the authorities to grant permission and the above order has also been complied. The above judgment was passed on 04.09.2020. Despite this Court interpreted and directed the authorities to grant permission, the authorities simply rejected the application citing Rule 7(2). Such act of the officials is certainly take away the rights of the citizens to have a decent living with dignity and to shelter and also it violates fundamental rights.
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - N A Venkatesh - Full Document

B. Nagaraj vs The Commissioner on 3 March, 2023

In L.LOGANATHAN Vs. THE COMMISSIONER, UDHAGAMANDALAM MUNICIPALITY, UDHAGAMANDALAM, NILGIRIS (W.P.No.10262 of 2020), the learned Single Judge of this Court extensively considered the Master Plan and Development Control Rules applicable to the Hill areas and also considering the Rule 7 (2) had directed the authorities to grant permission and the above order has also been complied. The above judgment was passed on 04.09.2020. Despite this Court interpreted and directed the authorities to grant permission, the authorities simply rejected the application citing Rule 7(2). Such act of the officials is certainly take away the rights of the citizens to have a decent living with dignity and to shelter and also it violates fundamental rights.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document
1