Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 156 (2.23 seconds)
Documents citing Resurgence India vs Election Commission Of India & Anr on 13 September, 2013

Madiraju Venkata Ramana Raju, vs Peddireddigari Ramachandra Reddy, on 15 December, 2018

26(d). Further and from what is discussed supra, it is not even a case of the returning officer pointed out any such defects or gaps to fill and still not complied with which is a pre-requisite even to reject as discussed supra including from what the 88 Dr.SSRB,J E.P.No.8 of 2014 expression of the 3 Judge Bench of the Apex Court in Resurgence India supra in 2014 observed, referring to Peoples Union for Civil Liberties of 2003 and Association for Democratic Reforms of 2002, that what also referred in Krishna Murthy supra that mainly deals with non-disclosure of criminal antecedents which is of substantial character of voter must know.
Telangana High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

P.Milany vs S.Arumugam on 18 September, 2019

In Resurgence India v. Election Commission of India [Resurgence India v. Election Commission of India, (2014) 14 SCC 189] this Court held that (SCC p. 200, para 21) every candidate is obligated to file an affidavit with relevant information with regard to their criminal antecedents, assets and liabilities and educational qualification. The fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the voter was reiterated in the said judgment and it was held that filing of affidavit with blank particulars would render the affidavit as nugatory.
Madras High Court Cites 68 - Cited by 0 - S S Sundar - Full Document

P.Milany vs S.Arumugam on 18 September, 2019

In Resurgence India v. Election Commission of India [Resurgence India v. Election Commission of India, (2014) 14 SCC 189] this Court held that (SCC p. 200, para 21) every candidate is obligated to file an affidavit with relevant information with regard to their criminal antecedents, assets and liabilities and educational qualification. The fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the voter was reiterated in the said judgment and it was held that filing of affidavit with blank particulars would render the affidavit as nugatory.
Madras High Court Cites 68 - Cited by 0 - S S Sundar - Full Document

Birendra Mandal vs Irfan Ansari on 18 December, 2019

In terms of Comment No.5 mentioned in Page-9 of the nomination paper which contains the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court given in the case of Resurgence India vs. Election Commission of India and others, he had not given 21 any opportunity to the candidates to remove the defects present in the nomination papers. He had accepted the nomination papers of Irfan Ansari and Bishnu Prasad Bhaiya who had contested the election from 09, Jamtara Legislative Assembly Constituency.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - A B Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next