Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (2.92 seconds)
Documents citing Mohd. Ahmed (Minor) vs Union Of India & Ors. on 17 April, 2014

Baby Devananda D (Minor) Thr Her Mother ... vs Employees State Insurance Corporation ... on 17 July, 2019

52. This Court, in case of Mohammed Ahmed (Minor) v. Union of India (supra) while balancing the Right to Health under Article 21 of the Constitution and the corresponding obligations of State under Articles 14 and 21, held that while the availability of finance with the Government is a relevant factor, but, at the same time, no Government ought to be allowed to say that it will not treat patients with chronic and rare diseases due to financial constraints, especially when their prognosis is good. It held:-
Delhi High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Manmohan - Full Document

Mohd Ahmad vs Union Of India on 23 August, 2017

2. During the examination it has been found that you do not fulfill the eligibility condition of at least 240 days of engagement as casual labourer (including broken period of service) during each of the two years of service as per Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms OM No. 49014/19-Est (C) dated 26.10.1984 nor the conditions laid down in Department of Personnel & Training OM No. 51016/2/90-Estt.(C) dated the 10th September, 1993 (copies enclosed).
Central Administrative Tribunal - Lucknow Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rakesh Malhotra vs Government Of National Capital ... on 4 June, 2021

14. Mr. Rao has drawn our attention to a judgment passed by this Court in Mohd. Ahmed (Minor) Vs. Union of India [(2014) SCC OnLine Del 1508], WP(C) No. 7279/2013. In this case, the Court called upon the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) to deal with the aforesaid limitation in the Rules. The judgment observes: "the Ministry of Corporate Affairs filed a letter dated 24.03.2014 before this Court stating "Ministry of Corporate Affairs has decided to amend the Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013 to bring Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 3031/2020 & connected matters Page 10 of 13 Digitally Signed By:BHUPINDER SINGH ROHELLA Signing Date:05.06.2021 15:53 in clarity regarding the ambit of „promoting preventive healthcare‟ as included in the said Schedule. It has been decided to amend the said item in Schedule VII as follows: „promoting healthcare including preventive healthcare‟. This would encompass the entire healthcare area, including the treatment of diseases, etc."....... This Affidavit clarifies that an activity carried out by a Company covered under Schedule VII which is a part of its core business, if not done with a profit motive, amounts to a CSR Activity. The aforesaid letter and affidavit of Ministry of Corporate Affairs are taken on record and accepted by this Court. Government of India is held bound by the same". (emphasis supplied)
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - V Sanghi - Full Document

Mohd. Kalim vs Employees State Insurance Corporaton & ... on 8 February, 2019

She further states that she will endeavour to notify the new policy for treatment of rare diseases within nine months. She assures this Court that while drafting the new National Policy for Treatment of Rare Diseases, not only the National Policy for Treatment of Rare Diseases, 2017 but also the judgment of this Court in Mohd. Ahmed (Minor) vs. Union of India, 2014 SCC OnLine Del 1508 as well as the United States' Orphan Drug Act 1983, the European Union Regulations 1999, Acts and Policies prevalent in Japan, Australia and Israel shall be taken into account.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Manmohan - Full Document

Sujit Ranjan Das vs Department Of Post on 4 April, 2025

7. Ld. Counsel for the applicants have submitted that rejection of candidature on the grounds, as in these OAs, were subjected to judicial scrutiny of this Bench in OA Nos. 317/2017 (Mohammed Ahmed Vs UOI & Ors) wherein this Bench of the Tribunal after examining the nitty gritty of the matter directed the respondents for reconsideration of the case of the applicant therein.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Cuttack Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Abhishek Panda vs Department Of Post on 4 April, 2025

7. Ld. Counsel for the applicants have submitted that rejection of candidature on the grounds, as in these OAs, were subjected to judicial scrutiny of this Bench in OA Nos. 317/2017 (Mohammed Ahmed Vs UOI & Ors) wherein this Bench of the Tribunal after examining the nitty gritty of the matter directed the respondents for reconsideration of the case of the applicant therein.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Cuttack Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next