Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs M.Rajendran on 24 June, 2016

A.Manivel vs The Principal Secretary To on 31 August, 2023

6.The Division Bench in P.V.Velliyangiri, considered the scope and ambit of the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.77 dated 12 July, 2013 and the policy decision expressed by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.39 dated 13 June, 2011 and opined that an employee working in a Panchayat as a Full Time Clerk or Part Time Clerk and having been absorbed prior to 01 April, 2003 would be entitled for counting 50% of the earlier service as part time employee under the consolidated pay for the purpose of computation of pensionary benefits. We are in agreement with the views expressed by the Division Bench in its judgment dated 11 April 2016 in W.A.No.431 of 2016. We are informed that, subsequently another Division Bench took the very same view in Government of Tamil Nadu and others vs. M.Rajendran and another (judgment dated 24 June 2016 in W.A.No.612 of 2016).
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.Kanagarajan vs The Principal Secretary To Government ... on 24 April, 2019

6.The Division Bench in P.V.Velliyangiri, considered the scope and ambit of the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.77 dated 12 July, 2013 and the policy decision expressed by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.39 dated 13 June, 2011 and opined that an employee working in a Panchayat as a Full Time Clerk or Part Time Clerk and having been absorbed prior to 01 April, 2003 would be entitled for counting 50% of the earlier service as part time employee under the consolidated pay for the purpose of computation of pensionary benefits. We are in agreement with the views expressed by the Division Bench in its http://www.judis.nic.in judgment dated 11 April 2016 in W.A.No.431 of 2016. We are 4 informed that, subsequently another Division Bench took the very same view in Government of Tamil Nadu and others vs. M.Rajendran and another (judgment dated 24 June 2016 in W.A.No.612 of 2016).
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

M.Ravichandran vs The Principal Secretary To Government ... on 9 May, 2019

6.The Division Bench in P.V.Velliyangiri, considered the scope and ambit of the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.77 dated 12 July, 2013 and the policy decision expressed by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.39 dated 13 June, 2011 and opined that an employee working in a Panchayat as a Full Time Clerk or Part Time Clerk and having been absorbed prior to 01 April, 2003 would be entitled for counting 50% of the earlier service as part time employee under the consolidated pay for the purpose of computation of pensionary benefits. We are in http://www.judis.nic.in 4 agreement with the views expressed by the Division Bench in its Judgment dated 11 April 2016 in W.A.No.431 of 2016. We are informed that, subsequently another Division Bench took the very same view in Government of Tamil Nadu and others Vs. M.Rajendran and another (Judgment dated 24 June 2016 in W.A.No.612 of 2016).
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - G R Swaminathan - Full Document

R.Kannan vs The Principal Secretary To Government ... on 9 May, 2019

6.The Division Bench in P.V.Velliyangiri, considered the scope and ambit of the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.77 dated 12 July, 2013 and the policy decision expressed by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.39 dated 13 June, 2011 and opined that an employee working in a Panchayat as a Full Time Clerk or Part Time Clerk and having been absorbed prior to 01 April, 2003 would be entitled for counting 50% of the earlier service as part time employee under the consolidated pay for the purpose of computation of pensionary benefits. We are in agreement with the views expressed by the Division Bench in its Judgment dated 11 April 2016 in W.A.No.431 of 2016. We are informed that, subsequently another Division Bench took the very same view in Government of Tamil Nadu and others Vs. M.Rajendran and another (Judgment http://www.judis.nic.in 4 dated 24 June 2016 in W.A.No.612 of 2016).
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - G R Swaminathan - Full Document

M.Ravichandran vs The Principal Secretary To Government ... on 9 May, 2019

6.The Division Bench in P.V.Velliyangiri, considered the scope and ambit of the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.77 dated 12 July, 2013 and the policy decision expressed by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.39 dated 13 June, 2011 and opined that an employee working in a Panchayat as a Full Time Clerk or Part Time Clerk and having been absorbed prior to 01 April, 2003 would be entitled for counting 50% of the earlier service as part time employee under the consolidated pay for the purpose of computation of pensionary benefits. We are in http://www.judis.nic.in 4 agreement with the views expressed by the Division Bench in its Judgment dated 11 April 2016 in W.A.No.431 of 2016. We are informed that, subsequently another Division Bench took the very same view in Government of Tamil Nadu and others Vs. M.Rajendran and another (Judgment dated 24 June 2016 in W.A.No.612 of 2016).
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - G R Swaminathan - Full Document

K.Selvaraj vs The Principal Secretary To Government ... on 24 April, 2019

6.The Division Bench in P.V.Velliyangiri, considered the scope and ambit of the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.77 dated 12 July, 2013 and the policy decision expressed by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.39 dated 13 June, 2011 and opined that an employee working in a Panchayat as a Full Time Clerk or Part Time Clerk and having been absorbed prior to 01 April, 2003 would be entitled for counting 50% of the earlier service as part time employee under the consolidated pay for the purpose of computation of pensionary benefits. We are in agreement with the views expressed by the Division Bench in its http://www.judis.nic.in judgment dated 11 April 2016 in W.A.No.431 of 2016. We are 4 informed that, subsequently another Division Bench took the very same view in Government of Tamil Nadu and others vs. M.Rajendran and another (judgment dated 24 June 2016 in W.A.No.612 of 2016).
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

The Government Of Tamil Nadu vs Tamil Nadu Rural Development ... on 22 March, 2018

6. The Division Bench in P.V.Velliyangiri, considered the scope and ambit of the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.77 dated 12 July, 2013 and the policy decision expressed by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.39 dated 13 June, 2011 and opined that an employee working in a Panchayat as a Full Time Clerk or Part Time Clerk and having been absorbed prior to 01 April, 2003 would be entitled for counting 50% of the earlier service as part time employee under the consolidated pay for the purpose of computation of pensionary benefits. We are in agreement with the views expressed by the Division Bench in its judgment dated 11 April 2016 in W.A.No.431 of 2016. We are informed that, subsequently another Division Bench took the very same view in Government of Tamil Nadu and others vs. M.Rajendran and another (judgment dated 24 June 2016 in W.A.No.612 of 2016)
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 4 - K K Sasidharan - Full Document
1