Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.25 seconds)

K.S. Negi Son Of Late Shri Himmat Singh ... vs Director Of Factories, Labour ... on 18 August, 2007

In the case of Bihari Lal Chauhan v. Director of Factories, U.P. Kanpur and Anr. 2003 (2) AWC 1069 it is has held that a writ petition against the company is not maintainable. It repelled the petitioner's argumnent who was an employee of the company and challenged the transfer order, holding that merely because there are statutory rules governing the services of the petitioner, it does not mean that the respondent company is an instrumentality of the State. If the plea of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted, then logically it will have to hold that a writ can be issued against the private factory owner since every factory is governed by statutory rules i.e the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act etc. Such a view cannot be countenanced. It is in very exceptional cases, where a public duty is imposed upon the person concerned, that a writ can be issued.
Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 1 - P Krishna - Full Document

Larsen & Toubro Employees Union vs The Labour Officer (Conciliation) on 20 October, 2016

In Bihari Lal Chauhan v. Director of Factories, U.P. Kanpur and anr., reported in 2003 (2) AWC 1069, it is has held that a writ petition against the company is not maintainable. It repelled the petitioner's argument, who was an employee of the company and challenged the transfer order, holding that merely because there are statutory rules governing the services of the petitioner, it does not mean that the respondent company is an instrumentality of the State. If the plea of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted, then logically it will have to hold that a writ can be issued against the private factory owner since every factory is governed by statutory rules i.e the Factories Act, Industrial Disputes Act, etc. Such a view cannot be countenanced. It is in very exceptional cases, where a public duty is imposed upon the person concerned, that a writ can be issued.
Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - S Manikumar - Full Document
1