Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.40 seconds)
Documents citing Union Of India vs Shishu Pal @ Shiv Pal on 21 October, 2019

Commissioner Of Police & Anr. vs Kumari Sangeeta on 31 January, 2025

18. So far as reliance of respondents on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Shishu Pal (supra) is concerned, we have gone through the same. In the said case it was found by the Hon'ble Apex Court that the respondents had not only failed to disclose that the applicant therein remained in judicial custody and on moving application, was released on bail by the Trial Court along with other co-accused.
Delhi High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - C H Shankar - Full Document

Delhi Transport Corporation (Dtc) ... vs Manohar Lai (Driver) Batch No. 26775 ... on 25 March, 2025

25. Ms. Manisha Tyagi, who appeared for the DTC, also placed Signature Not Verified Signed By:MEENU LPA 13/2021 Page 23 of 26 KALRA Signing Date:25.03.2025 13:29:53 reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in UOI v Shishu Pal14. She sought to submit that the decision in Shishu Pal reiterates the principles that the very act of concealment, in the application form submitted by the candidates for appointment to the post of driver in the DTC, of the fact that there was a pending criminal case against him, was sufficient to cancel his candidature. Shishu Pal having been rendered chronologically after Ravindra Kumar, the contention is that we should follow Shishu Pal instead of Ravindra Kumar.
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - C H Shankar - Full Document

The Senior Commandant vs A.Karthick on 4 August, 2025

3.The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for the appellants drew our attention to the relevant provision in the policy guidelines. He submitted that suppression on a part of a candidate who wants to join uniformed force has to be viewed very seriously. He relied on the 6/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 13/08/2025 10:24:35 am ) W.A.(MD)No.1275 of 2024 decisions reported in 2024 INSC 550 (Union of India Vs. Shishu Pal @ Shiv Pal). He further added that the selection was made in the year 2014 – 2015 and that more than decade had elapsed. The writ petitioner's appointment was cancelled before he could formally join service. He, therefore, submitted that in view of efflux of time, this Court ought to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - G R Swaminathan - Full Document

The Senior Commandant vs A.Karthick on 4 August, 2025

3.The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for the appellants drew our attention to the relevant provision in the policy guidelines. He 6/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/08/2025 02:44:37 pm ) W.A.(MD)No.1275 of 2024 submitted that suppression on a part of a candidate who wants to join uniformed force has to be viewed very seriously. He relied on the decisions reported in 2024 INSC 550 (Union of India Vs. Shishu Pal @ Shiv Pal). He further added that the selection was made in the year 2014 – 2015 and that more than decade had elapsed. The writ petitioner's appointment was cancelled before he could formally join service. He, therefore, submitted that in view of efflux of time, this Court ought to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - G R Swaminathan - Full Document
1