Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.92 seconds)

Sh. Trilok Chand vs M/S Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd on 18 September, 2021

By relying upon the decisions rendered in D.L.F Universal Ltd. (supra), B. B. Verma vs. National Project Construction Corporation Ltd. 80 (1990) DLT 498, Patel Roadways Ltd. vs. Tropical Agro Systems Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1992 SC 1514, it was held that merely because the respondents have an office in Delhi would not enable the Labour Court of Delhi to exercise jurisdiction in the matter.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

B.S. Virdi Electric Works vs Union Of India And Anr. on 25 January, 2002

In this connection, reference may be made to the Division Bench decisions of this court in B.B. Verma v. National Projects Construction Corporation Ltd. and in Union of India v. Electronic Controls & Instrument Engineers . In the subsequent Division Bench decision of this court, this court held that as the work in question was to be carried out at Patiala, which was to be supervised by the Executive Engineer stationed at Patiala and the tenders were also called at Patiala, as such the entire cause of action arose at Patiala, which is not within the territorial jurisdiction of this court.
Delhi High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - M Sharma - Full Document

M. Vadivelu vs Rajkishan & Company & Ors. on 25 August, 2014

29. A Division Bench of this Court in B.B. Verma v. National Project Construction Corporation Ltd.: 80 (1999) DLT 498 following the decision of Supreme Court in Patel Roadways Ltd. v. Tropical Agrosystems Pvt. Ltd.: AIR 1992 SC 1514 held that a Court would not have the jurisdiction to entertain a petition, if the cause of action had not arisen within its territorial jurisdiction.
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 10 - V Bakhru - Full Document

Shri Shailender Kumar vs The Secretary (Labour) & Anr. on 12 October, 2015

By relying upon the decisions rendered in D.L.F Universal Ltd. (supra), B.B.Verma vs. National Project Construction Corporation Ltd. 80 (1990) DLT 498, Patel Roadways Ltd. vs. Tropical Agro Systems Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1992 SC 1514, it was held that merely because the respondents have an office in Delhi would not enable the Labour Court of Delhi to exercise jurisdiction in the matter.
Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 2 - S Gupta - Full Document

Sh. Deepak Kumar vs M/S. Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd on 17 July, 2017

By relying upon the decisions rendered in D.L.F Universal   Ltd.   (supra),   B.   B.   Verma   vs. National   Project   Construction   Corporation Ltd.   80   (1990)   DLT   498,   Patel   Roadways Ltd. vs. Tropical Agro Systems Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1992   SC   1514,   it   was   held   that   merely because   the   respondents   have   an   office   in Delhi would not enable the Labour Court of Delhi to exercise jurisdiction in the matter.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Rajik vs M/S. Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd on 17 July, 2017

By relying upon the decisions rendered in D.L.F Universal   Ltd.   (supra),   B.   B.   Verma   vs. National   Project   Construction   Corporation Ltd.   80   (1990)   DLT   498,   Patel   Roadways Ltd. vs. Tropical Agro Systems Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1992   SC   1514,   it   was   held   that   merely because   the   respondents   have   an   office   in LC 2404/16. 16/38 Delhi would not enable the Labour Court of Delhi to exercise jurisdiction in the matter.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Jaswant Singh vs M/S. Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd on 18 July, 2017

By relying upon the decisions rendered in D.L.F Universal   Ltd.   (supra),   B.   B.   Verma   vs. National   Project   Construction   Corporation Ltd.   80   (1990)   DLT   498,   Patel   Roadways Ltd. vs. Tropical Agro Systems Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1992   SC   1514,   it   was   held   that   merely because   the   respondents   have   an   office   in Delhi would not enable the Labour Court of Delhi to exercise jurisdiction in the matter.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next