Laltu vs Ram Lal on 13 August, 1968
Sulki v. Mohanlal Adku, AIR 1961 Madh Pra 47, after referring to some of the cases dealing with the question, held that witnesses who had not been named in the list under Section 252 (2) are not covered by the expression "any remaining witnesses" in Section 256 and the complainant has no right to insist upon calling fresh witnesses, although the request of the complainant to call additional witnesses may be considered where justice so requires.