Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (0.79 seconds)
Documents citing Sanjeev Nanda vs The State on 12 May, 2009

Radha @ Radhakrishnan vs State Of Tamil Nadu

of Police, (2004) 3 SCC 767 : 2004 SCC 22/43 http://www.judis.nic.in ____________ Crl. A. No.123/2005 (Cri) 882] , this Court held that if a court finds that in the process the credit of the witness has not been completely shaken, he may after reading and considering the evidence of the witness as a whole, with due caution, accept, in the light of the evidence on the record that part of his testimony which it finds to be creditworthy and act upon it. This is exactly what was done in the instant case by both the trial court and the High Court [Sanjeev Nanda v. State, 2009 SCC OnLine Del 2039 : (2009) 160 DLT 775] and they found the accused guilty.
Madras High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - M Dhandapani - Full Document

The State vs Vazhivittan

of Police, (2004) 3 SCC 767 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 882] , this Court held that if a court finds that in the process the credit of the witness has not been completely shaken, he may after reading and considering the evidence of the witness as a whole, with due caution, accept, in the light of the evidence on the record that part of his testimony which it finds to be creditworthy and act upon it. This is exactly what was done in the instant case by both the trial court and the High Court 23/45 http://www.judis.nic.in _____________ Crl. A. (MD) No.314/2015 [Sanjeev Nanda v. State, 2009 SCC OnLine Del 2039 : (2009) 160 DLT 775] and they found the accused guilty.
Madras High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - M Dhandapani - Full Document

Arun Sharma vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 November, 2020

of Police, this Court held that if a court finds that in the process the credit of the witness has not been completely shaken, he may after reading and considering the evidence of the witness as a whole, with due caution, accept, in the light of the evidence on the record that part of his testimony which it finds to be creditworthy and act upon it. This is exactly what was done in the instant case by both the trial court and the High Court [Sanjeev Nanda v. State] and they found the accused guilty.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Shambhu @ Shimbhu Lodhi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 28 September, 2022

2004 SCC (Cri) 882] , this Court held that if a court finds that in the process the credit of the witness has not been completely shaken, he may after reading and considering the evidence of the witness as a whole, with due caution, accept, in the light of the evidence on the record that part of his testimony which it finds to be creditworthy and act upon it. This is exactly what was done in the instant case by both the trial court and the High Court [Sanjeev Nanda v. State, 2009 SCC OnLine Del 2039 : (2009) 160 DLT 775] and they found the accused guilty.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 2 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

State Of U.P. vs Mukhtar Ansari on 21 September, 2022

of Police, (2004) 3 SCC 767 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 882] , this Court held that if a court finds that in the process the credit of the witness has not been completely shaken, he may after reading and considering the evidence of the witness as a whole, with due caution, accept, in the light of the evidence on the record that part of his testimony which it finds to be creditworthy and act upon it. This is exactly what was done in the instant case by both the trial court and the High Court [Sanjeev Nanda v. State, 2009 SCC OnLine Del 2039 : (2009) 160 DLT 775] and they found the accused guilty.
Allahabad High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 4 - D K Singh - Full Document

Ps Crime Branch vs Samir Ahluwalia (On Court Bail) on 13 September, 2013

It has also been mentioned in the charge sheet that the accused no. 3 did not produce the SIM card and informed that he had lost the same in February, 2013. It thus seems that in this context Section 201 IPC has invoked in the present matter by the prosecution. It is pertinent to note,however, that accused no.3 Subhash Chandra has been shown as one of the principal offender of the main offence and his name has been mentioned in column no. 11 of the charge sheet. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case titled as Jitender Nath V. Ram Phal Bansal 2010 (3) JCC 1680 has quoted with approval one other judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in case titled as Sanjeev Nanda V. State 160 (2009) DLT 775 wherein in relation to the offence under Section 201 IPC, the Hon'ble High Court held as follows:
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next