Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.79 seconds)

Ei Dupont India Pvt. Ltd. And Anr vs Union Of India And Ors on 14 January, 2019

8. Mr Soni, who appears for the respondents, has also not advanced any contention to dispute that petitioners' claim for the relief as sought by it in this petition. He, however, states that an appeal against the common order passed in W.P.(C) 7011/2012 captioned Yum Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. and Anr v. Union of India & Ors. and other connected matters, decided on 27.01.2015 is pending before the Division Bench of this Court. However, he does not controvert the submission that the subject matter of the appeal, essentially, relates to the provisions of the SFIS Scheme under FTP 09-14 (and not FTP 04-09).
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V Bakhru - Full Document

Shree Naman Hotels Pvt. Ltd vs The Union Of India Through The Ministry ... on 17 August, 2015

11. After receipt of this order dated 5th December, 2014 passed by this Court, the Petitioner approached the Respondent no.3 and requested him to issue a clarification. The Petitioner also relied upon inter alia on the judgment and Order of the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court dated 27th January 2015 and in the case of "M/s Yum Restaurants (I) Pvt. Ltd & Anr Vs Union of India & Ors." in Writ Petition (Civil) No.7011 of 2012 and Writ Petition (C) No.6800 of 2013 together with other Petitions.

M/S Bright Engineering Works vs The Union Of India And Ors. on 15 September, 2017

7. Mr Parikh further contended that in any event, the Circular no. 84 dated 30.04.2009 could not override the FTP 09-14. He relied upon the W.P.(C) 2564/2017 Page 6 of 20 decision of the Supreme Court in Atul Commodities Private Limited and Ors. v. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin 9: (2009) 5 SCC 46 and the decision of this Court in Yum Restaurants (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India:
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - V Bakhru - Full Document

M/S. Cummins Technologies India Pvt. ... vs Union Of India on 6 November, 2017

Signature Not Verified There appears to be a conflict of views Digitally signed by NEETU KHAJURIA Date: 2017.11.06 16:50:39 IST Reason: between two High Courts i.e. High Court of Delhi in the case of “M/s. Yum Restaurants (I) Pvt. Ltd. 2 vs. Union of India 2015” reported in (320)ELT 781 (Del) and the High Court of Bombay in the case of “Naman Hotel & Others vs. Union of India”, reported in 2015 (326) ELT 513 (Bom).
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1