Ashok Bhumanna Chepurvar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 22 February, 2010
28. For the view we have taken, it may not be
necessary to burden this Judgment with the
reported decisions relied upon by the counsel for
the parties as the same do not have bearing on the
view that we have taken. To complete the record we
may only make reference to those decisions. The
Petitioner relied on the Supreme Court decision in
the case of Bar Council of Delhi vs. Union of
India, A.I.R. 1980 Supreme Court, 1612 (Paras 8
and 10), Ahmednagar Zillha S.D.V. & P. Sangh vs.
State of Maharashtra and others, 2004 (1) S.C.C.
Page 133 (Paras 3 to 6), Pundlik vs. State of
Maharashtra, A.I.R. 2005 Supreme Court, Page 3746
(Paras 16 and 17), and the decision of Division
Bench of this Court in Dattatraya Kachru Chine vs.
State of Maharashtra, 2005 (4) Mh. L.J. Page 243
(Para 23), Bapu Maruti Rakshe vs. State of
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:38:25 :::
49
Maharashtra, 2007 (3) Bom.