Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.34 seconds)

Dcit-C-6(2), Mumbai vs Samira Habitats India Limited, Mumbai on 9 May, 2025

13. We find that considering the similar facts, the coordinate bench of the Tribunal in case of assessee's sister concern in DCIT v/s Samira Residences Private Limited, in ITA No. 1775/Mum./2018, for the assessment year 2009- 10, vide order dated 29/06/2021, upheld the findings of the learned CIT(A), which were relied upon in the impugned order in the present case. The relevant findings of the coordinate bench, in the aforesaid decision, are reproduced as follows: -
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dcit-C-6(2), Mumbai vs Samira Habitats India Limited, Mumbai on 9 May, 2025

13. We find that considering the similar facts, the coordinate bench of the Tribunal in case of assessee's sister concern in DCIT v/s Samira Residences Private Limited, in ITA No. 1775/Mum./2018, for the assessment year 2009- 10, vide order dated 29/06/2021, upheld the findings of the learned CIT(A), which were relied upon in the impugned order in the present case. The relevant findings of the coordinate bench, in the aforesaid decision, are reproduced as follows: -
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mangukia Brothers,, Surat vs Assessee

In this context, reliance is also placed upon the Mumbai ITAT's decision in the case of DCIT Vs. Samir Dianionds Export Pvt. Ltd. reported in 71 ITD 75, i 5.10 I, therefore, in view of the above defects in the system of method of accounting, reject the book results of the assessee under section 145(3) of the IT. Act and proceed to estimate the value of closing stock and estimate the Gross profit as under:"
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1