Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 514 (0.93 seconds)
Documents citing Manjuri Bera vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. And Anr on 30 March, 2007

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Tara Devi & Others on 19 February, 2021

In para 15 of Manjuri Bera [Manjuri Bera v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., (2007) 10 SCC 643 : (2008) 1 SCC (Cri) 585] , while adverting to the provisions of Section 140 of the Act, the Court observed that even if there is no loss of dependency, the claimant, if he was a legal representative, will be entitled to compensation. In the concurring judgment of S.H. Kapadia, J., as his Lordship then was, it is observed that there is distinction between "right to apply for compensation" and "entitlement to compensation". The compensation constitutes part of the estate of the deceased. As a result, the legal representative of the deceased would inherit the estate. Indeed, in that case, the Court was dealing with the case of a married daughter of the deceased and the efficacy of Section 140 of the Act. Nevertheless, the principle underlying the exposition in this decision would clearly come to the aid of Respondents 1 and 2 (claimants) even though they are major sons of the deceased and also earning.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - K P Deo - Full Document

National Insurance Co Ltd vs Baldev Kalra & Ors on 22 September, 2014

12. The judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Smt.Manjuri Bera vs. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.(supra) does not forbid the Tribunal from granting compensation for loss of estate where there is no loss of dependency of any of the legal representatives of the deceased. Loss of estate would be part of „just compensation‟ as provided under Section 168 of MV Act. Hence, there is no merit in the first submission of the learned counsel for the appellant.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - J Nath - Full Document

M/S United India Insurance Company Ltd. vs Thakur Shiva Ratan Singh, on 7 June, 2024

In para 15 of Manjuri Bera [Manjuri Bera v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., (2007) 10 SCC 643 : (2008) 1 SCC (Cri) 585] , while adverting to the provisions of Section 140 of the Act, the Court observed that even if there is no loss of dependency, the claimant, if he was a legal representative, will be entitled to compensation. In the concurring judgment of S.H. Kapadia, J., as his Lordship then was, it is observed that there is distinction between "right to apply for compensation" and "entitlement to compensation". The compensation constitutes part of the estate of the deceased. As a result, the legal representative of the deceased would inherit the estate. Indeed, in that case, the Court was dealing with the case of a married daughter of the deceased and the efficacy of Section 140 of the Act. Nevertheless, the principle underlying the exposition in this decision would clearly come to the aid of Respondents 1 and 2 (claimants) even though they are major sons of the deceased and also earning.
Telangana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Reliance General Ins. Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Ajeeta Nayar on 13 May, 2026

In para 15 of Manjuri Bera [Manjuri Bera v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., (2007) 10 SCC 643 : (2008) 1 SCC (Cri) 585] , while adverting to the provisions of Section 140 of the Act, the Court observed that even if there is no loss of dependency, the claimant, if he was a legal representative, will be entitled to compensation. In the concurring judgment of S.H. Kapadia, J., as his Lordship then was, it is observed that there is distinction between "right to apply for compensation" and "entitlement to compensation". The compensation constitutes part of the estate of the deceased. As a result, the legal representative of the deceased would inherit the estate. Indeed, in that case, the Court was dealing with the case of a married daughter of the deceased and the efficacy of Section 140 of the Act. Nevertheless, the principle underlying the exposition in this decision would clearly come to the aid of Respondents 1 and 2 (claimants) even though they are major sons of the deceased and also earning.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Thr. vs Smt. Laxmi Bai on 12 March, 2025

In para 15 of Manjuri Bera [Manjuri Bera v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., (2007) 10 SCC 643 : (2008) 1 SCC (Cri) 585] , while adverting to the provisions of Section 140 of the Act, the Court observed that even if there is no loss of dependency, the claimant, if he was a legal representative, will be entitled to compensation. In the concurring judgment of S.H. Kapadia, J., as his Lordship then was, it is observed that there is distinction between "right to apply for compensation" and "entitlement to compensation". The compensation constitutes part of the estate of the deceased. As a result, the legal representative of the deceased would inherit the estate. Indeed, in that case, the Court was dealing with the case of a married daughter of the deceased and the efficacy of Section 140 of the Act. Nevertheless, the principle underlying the exposition in this decision would clearly come to the aid of Respondents 1 and 2 (claimants) even though they are major sons of the deceased and also earning.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

The New India Assurance Comp. Ltd. ... vs Smt. Dhan Raji And Ors. on 16 May, 2025

In para 15 of Manjuri Bera [Manjuri Bera v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., (2007) 10 SCC 643 : (2008) 1 SCC (Cri) 585] , while adverting to the provisions of Section 140 of the Act, the Court observed that even if there is no loss of dependency, the claimant, if he was a legal representative, will be entitled to compensation. In the concurring judgment of S.H. Kapadia, J., as his Lordship then was, it is observed that there is distinction between ?right to apply for compensation? and ?entitlement to compensation?. The compensation constitutes part of the estate of the deceased. As a result, the legal representative of the deceased would inherit the estate. Indeed, in that case, the Court was dealing with the case of a married daughter of the deceased and the efficacy of Section 140 of the Act. Nevertheless, the principle underlying the exposition in this decision would clearly come to the aid of Respondents 1 and 2 (claimants) even though they are major sons of the deceased and also earning.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - A Moin - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next