Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.60 seconds)
Documents citing Sushila Ramavtar Agarwal And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 21 January, 2019

Gita D/O. Bhaskar Shejwal vs The State Of Mah. Thr. Pso, Bajaj Nagar, ... on 8 February, 2024

17. By referring the earlier decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court held in the case of Sushila Agrawal and others vs State rkn 15 39aba73.2024.odt of (NCT of Delhi) and Another7, the Constitution Bench of this Court held that while considering an application for grant of pre-arrest bail the Court has to consider the nature of the offence, the role of the person, the likelihood of his influencing the course of investigation, or tampering with evidence or likelihood of fleeing justice. The Court held;-
Bombay High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Bimla vs Raj Kumar on 7 June, 2019

14. The plaintiffs have relied upon the judgement of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay (Nagpur bench) in Sushila and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra decided on 17.02.2016 wherein it was held that the Civil Court acting under Section 9 CPC, has inherent powers in its plenary jurisdiction de hors with reference to Section 34 of Specific Relief Act to grant relief qua Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act.
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mangla Prasad Dubey And 2 Oters vs State Of U.P. on 13 November, 2019

Learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the question as to whether anticipatory bail is being granted for limited period or it would mean grant of bail till the conclusion of trial, has been referred to the larger Bench in the case of Sushila Aggarwal and others vs. State & Anr. and therefore, since the charge-sheet has been submitted and cognizance has been taken against the applicants, no such relief for grant of anticipatory bail be allowed to the applicants.
Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - B A Sthalekar - Full Document
1