Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (2.11 seconds)

Power Grid Corporation Of India vs Banshidhar And Another on 31 October, 2017

"Clause (d) of Rule 11 of Order 7 applies to those cases only, where the statement made by the plaintiff in the plaint without any doubt or dispute shows that the suit is barred by any law in force. It is the plaint only which is to be seen for a decision under Order 7 Rule 11 (ITC vs Rakesh Behari Srivastava AIR 1997 All 323; Satyanand Sahu vs Ratikanta Panda, AIR 1997 Ori 67).
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - U C Dhyani - Full Document

Bimal Kumar Barua vs M/S Rayban Sun Optics India Ltd And ... on 28 May, 2013

Before a Division Bench of this Court in AIR 1997 Allahabad 323 ITC Ltd. Vs. Rakesh Behari Srivastava and others, the provisions of Order VII, Rule 11 in context of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 came for consideration. A suit was filed by the respondents for restraining the revisionist ITC Ltd. from selling a particular brand of cigarette. The defendant filed an application praying for rejection of the plaint under Order VII, Rule 11 C.P.C. The application under Order VII, Rule 11 C.P.C. was although rejected by the Court below but in the civil revision filed against the said order, the High Court allowed the said revision and rejected the plaint under Order VII, Rule 11 C.P.C. In paragraphs 22 and 25 following was laid down:
Allahabad High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vrundavan Cooperative Housing Society ... vs Vrundavan Development Corporation on 5 July, 2024

45 Order VII Rule 11 of the C.P.C. casts a duty upon the Court to reject the plaint if the circumstances indicates therein are found to be existing. It cannot be the law that this power of the Court would be curtailed in any manner even if the Court proceeds with the suit to some length, without application of mind, on this point. The rule itself does not indicate anywhere that the power is to be exercised upon an application or, if such an application is filed, it should be at a particular stage. I may only add that an action under Order VII Rule 11 of the C.P.C. does not await an application by any party. It is the duty of the Court to reject the plaint if reasons, therefore, are found to be existing from a reading of the plaint itself and other documents relied upon by the plaintiff and annexed with the plaint. 46 In the aforesaid context, I may refer to and rely upon a decision of the Allahabad High Court in the case of ITC Limited vs. Rakesh Srivastava reported in AIR 1997 Allahabad 323, wherein it has been observed as under:
Gujarat High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 0 - B Vaishnav - Full Document

Smt. Kamla Devi Aggarwal vs Sh. Shiv Kishan Agarwal on 16 May, 2007

ýMÿ ý? J÷^ýMÿ Gú ü ý& @ ý û þŠú ü& ø ÷ ý ø ù$ rýA fú J÷ ý £þ¤þB%< '÷ ý& #ýgû¥ü& iý £þC1ˆýMÿ ü mø—ý&!ü SýMü& , ü DE 4%ÿ$ ÿ›ø—ý- ÷ HøF J÷Vý(ÿ v÷ 5 qû–þ þ& ÷ ÷ ýpøF J÷ ýMÿ =ü møšý- ü¾û þHGI møšýMü& ü¾û þKJ}ü& $ ML 'üNDO0 ù ý®ù ÷ !ü ý(ÿ <ú üOû wø û ÷–ø û þKJ}ü& PL 'üNDiø,QR iýN 3 : 3 û'ù ü~ýtÿ ø;÷ û S¹ù ü mø4 5 T iý û ÷kýOû4ü& iý £þC1*ýMÿ ÷ ý(ü øU , $ > J÷žýMÿ ’ü& wø—ý- ü:õ 2 õ 3 û'ù ÷ ø mø™þOû üŠýMÿ V þ& ÷ '÷ ý”ø ø—ý(üOû ÷ :1§ü §ù ú û!÷žýMÿ WS¹ù ÷ ý ITC Ltd., v/s Rakesh Bihari Srivastava and others reported in AIR 1997 Allahabad 323 %?ÿ ü& J÷8 rý. mø¦ÿ 5 ­ýMÿ ý ý(ÿ XS¹ù üY mø iý û!÷Gû–þŠýMÿ Z : $ 3 û'ù ü1ý J÷6ý(ÿ , ý¤ý&!üƒû þ '÷ /5 ' %ý û!÷­û þÀü møšýMü& %ý û ÷§ÿ ø[0 ÷\ ] qú 5 :16ý- D^!÷ %< 1qù ÷ ü ýMÿ ,J}ü& _ '÷ `L. ü –ÿ ÷ mø `L 'üNDiøaQR iý(õ 16 b c d egf hji5k l m n o p&i q rAs n t$o u b]l r bvpCp q&n t k e b u r&n e rNs n m u bTe w i l r-n l/r b igl m,x/y,u5q-z k b{l z,rAs u r5rNs n|t o u b]l r b:p}pY~'m w u m n_b'm6rNs u re n p&n l e u5l/rYm s u e"z$i r5rNq-u5l m^p&n q q&n e(rAs n)rNq-u$e ng€,u5q ‚i p rAs nXt u qƒrAl n qYm s$b]t.pYb]q € b]l rNs n b]q l u € n b]l n „ w o{k m b i l i p…t$o u b]l r bvpCp…x/y t q i e5k w b]l z rAs n p&i q-z$n e u l e p-u5x q b w u r&n e†t u5qƒrAl ngq-m s b]t)e n n eMx n p igq n‡rNs nXˆ‰n z b'm^rAq&u5qŠi p ‹Iq&u$e nŒ u5qN/f Ž r.b'mk q&z$n erAs u r ˆIn z b'm^rNq-u5q s u m‘l i7t i ’‚n qar-i;z b:“ nZp b{l e b]l z8r&i\rNs n n p}p&n w r”rNs u r•rAs nMm/u b e t u5qƒrAl ngq-m s b]tWe n n eW’‚u mOp&i q-z$n eMu l e p-u5x qYb w u r-n e e i w k € n l/rN– b:rŠb'm<rAs n`e i €,u b]l_i p rNs nWhab:“$b o h—i5k qƒrAfŽTrŠb'm˜p k qƒrAs n qKu5q-z k n e rAs u rŠm b]l w † n b]l™rAs nXt q&n m n l rBm k$b:rN– t o u b]l/r bvp}pHs u m_t q&u y n e|p&i qKe n w o u5q&u r b igl r-i rAs nZn p}p&n w š r rAs u rarNs n8m/u b eZt u5qCrNl ngq-m s b]tUe n n e ’<u m›up&i q-z$n e\u5l e p-u5x q b w u r&n e(e i w k € ngl rN–gs ngl w n rAs n‡hab:“$b oEhji5k qƒrBs u mIœk q b'm4e5b w r b i l<r-iOrAqƒy rAs n‡t q&n m n l rm k b rAf b b c žRe € b:r}r&n e5o:y b]l rAs n b]l m^r-u l r m k b:rN–(rNs n €,u b]l t q&u y n qi pWrAs n t o u b]l r b:p}pšb'm rAs u rBrNs n…t u5qCrNl n q-m s b]t e n n ee u r&n eŸ ¡T¢6£Ii “ ng€(x n q Ÿ4¤ ¥E¦ x n e n w o u q n e l$k$o o6u5l e9“ i b e x n5b]l z u§p&i q-z$n e u5l e €,u5l kEp-u w r k q n e e i w k € n l/rN– rAs$k$m x n w u5l w n5o'o n e f ¨•o u b]l r bvpCp s u m o n “ n o n e rAs n u o o n z u r b i l m8u z u b]l m^r rNs n>e n p&n l e u5l/rYmrAs u r,rNs n y©s u “ nªp&i q-z$n e s n q m b z5l u r k q n u l e m s n s u$e l n “ n q"n „ n w kEr&n e rAs n m u bTe t u5qCrNl n q-m s b]t e n n egf Ž r_b'mVu o'm4i k l e b'm t k/r-n e«p&u w r.rAs u r rAs n e n p ngl e u5l r m>s u e z$i r rAq&u5l m^p&n qNq n e|rNs n†e b'm t$kEr&n eXq&n z b'm^r&ngq n e|rAq&u$e n €,u5qN¬m|b]l rNs n b]qBl u5€ n igl rAs n x u m b'mZi p_m/u b e t u qƒrAl n qYm s$b]t©e n n e fO­ k qCrNs n q –Fb:r"b'mZu o'm i l i r)b]l 17 ® ¯'° ±$²E³&´ ³Nµ ¶ ³\·‰´ ¸ ¯'°^³A¹&¶5¹Uµ ¶ ° º » ± » ¼½´g¹›³&» µ » ¾ ® ³Aµ ¶ ³†³Nµ ´ °/¶ ¯ ® ± ¶ ¹ƒ³Aº ´ ¹Y° µ$¯]±M¯'°(³Aµ ´›¿ »g¹&¸$´ ® ¶ º ®…À,¶5º$² ¿&¶ Á³N² ¹&´ ®[® » Á ² À ´gº ³ÄÃů:³j¯'°_³Aµ ´ ¹ ´ ¶ ¾]À » ¿ ³Nµ ´WÆa¯:Ç$¯ ¾ Ɨ»5² ¹C³» º ¾:È É ÊIµ$² ° Ë ¯]º`À<È(»g± ¯]º ¯ »gº ³Aµ ´ Æa¯ Ç ¯ ¾/Ɨ»5² ¹ƒ³ µ ¶ °•̝² ¹ ¯'°4® ¯ Á¬³ ¯T»gº<³&»(´gº ³-´ ¹ƒ³Y¶ ¯]º<³Aµ ´‡± ¹ ´ ° ´ º/³g° ² ¯:³NÉ ¯ ¯ ¯ Í ÊIµ ´‡¿&¶ Á³ ° » ¿ Á ¶ ° ´ Î ° ² ± ¹-¶$͕¼‚´ ¹ ´"³-» ³Y¶ ¾ ¾:È ITCLimited's ® ¯v¿}¿ ´g¹ ´gº ³)¿ ¹&» À ³Aµ ´ Á ¶ ° ´ ¯]º µ ¶5º ® ¶ ° ¯]º9³Nµ ¶ ³WÁE¶ °4´ ³Nµ ´ ¿&» ¹&´ ¯ ¸5º ÁE» À(± ¶ º ¯ ´ °‘µ ¶$®7¶ ¾'¾ » ¼½´ ®‘³Nµ ´>® ´ ¿&´ º ® ¶5º/³Y°[³-»«²$°4´;³Aµ ´;³N¹-¶$® ´gÀ,¶5¹ Ï ¼F¯ ³Aµ » ²/³‡¸ ¯:Ç$¯]º ¸ ³-» ³Nµ ´ À ³Nµ ´ Ï/º » ¼‚Нµ » ¼.˙´ Ñ ± ´g¹ƒ³ ¯'° ´ » ¹)³-´ Á µ º ¯ Á ¶ ¾ ¶ °E° ¯ °^³Y¶5º ÁE´…¶5º ®›³Nµ ´PÁ ¯ ¸ ¶ ¹ ´ ³}³-´ °XÀ,¶5º ²E¿-¶$Á¬³ ² ¹ ´ ®;Ò È ³Aµ ´…® ´ ¿ ´gº ® ¶ º ³ ° ¼‚´ ¹ ´|¯]ºE¿ ´ ¹ ¯ » ¹g¯]º Ó5² ¶ ¾ ¯:³CÈF³Nµ ¶5º<³Nµ » ° ´‡À,¶5º ²E¿&¶ Á³N² ¹&´ ®‡Ò/È7³Aµ ´ ¿ »g¹ ´ ¯ ¸ º ÁE» À(± ¶ º ¯ ´ ° ɏÊIµ ´ ® ´ ¿ ´gº ® ¶5º ³ ° » Ò/³-¶ ¯{º ´ ® ¹&´ ¸ ¯'°^³N¹-¶ ³ ¯ » º » ¿>³Aµ ´ °4´ ³A¹&¶$® ´ À,¶5¹NϬ°|Ò È‡° ² ± ± ¹&´ °E°E¯ »gº)» ¿g¿-¶$Á¬³Ô¶5º ®_³Aµ ´ Ȇµ ¶$®›º ´ Ç ´g¹•¯]º/¿ »g¹ À ´ ® ³Aµ ´‡± ¾ ¶ ¯]º ³ ¯v¿}¿-°<» ¹$³Nµ ´‡±$² Ò ¾ ¯ ÁF¶ ³K¾ ¶ ¹&¸ ´,³Nµ ¶ ³ ³Aµ ´(Á ¯ ¸ ¶5¹&´ ³C³-´ ° ² º ® ´ ¹$³Aµ » ° ´ Ò ¹-¶5º ® º ¶5À ´ °½¼‚´ ¹ ´Xº » ³ŠÒ ´5¯]º ¸ À,¶5º ²E¿-¶$Á¬³ ² ¹ ´ ®›² º ® ´ ¹ ³Aµ ´ ¾ ¯TÁE´ º °4´"» ¹ ¶ ²E³Nµ » ¹Y¯:³}È » ¿ ¿ »g¹ ´ ¯ ¸ º Á/»gÀ(± ¶5º/È É ÊIµ ´ °4´ ¼‚´ ¹ ´ ³Aµ ´ À ¯'° ¹&´ ± ¹ ´ ° ´ º/³-¶ ³ ¯ »gº °‘¶5º ®§¿N¹&¶5² ®9³Nµ ¶ ³.¼‚´ ¹&´ ¶ ¾ ¾ ´ ¸ ´ ® ¯]º8³Nµ ´ ± ¾ ¶ ¯]º ³AÉ Õ µ$¯ ¾T´ ¯]º ³Aµ ´ ± ¹ ´ ° ´ º/³ Á ¶ ° ´ Ë ³Aµ ´ ¶ ¾ ¾ ´ ¸ ¶ ³ ¯T»gº ° ¶ ¸ ¶ ¯]º °^³ ³Aµ ´ ® ´ ¿ ´gº ® ¶5º ³ °,¶5¹&´_³Nµ ¶ ³K³Aµ ´ È`µ ¶$®(¿&» ¹&¸ ´ ®‡³Nµ ´›± ¶5¹C³Nº ´ ¹-° µ ¯]±(® ´ ´ ®W® ¶ ³&´ ® Ö4× ØTÙ…Ú » Ç ´gÀ(Ò ´ ¹ Ö4Û5Ü Ý ¯]º » ¹ ® ´ ¹W³-» ¸ ´ ³ ³N¹-¶5º °Â¿ ´g¹"³Aµ ´ ¹&´ ¸ ¯ °^³-´ ¹ ´ ® ³A¹&¶$® ´ À,¶5¹Nϙ¯]º ³Nµ ´ ¯]¹•¯]º ³Aµ ´ ´ Ñ Á ¾ ²$°E¯ »gº)» ¿I± ¾ ¶ ¯]º/³ ¯v¿}¿ ÉÞ.» ¹&´ » Ç ´ ¹NË ¯]º ± ¶ ¹&¶ ß à » ¿B³Nµ ´O̝² ® ¸5À ´ º/³NËBƗ»5² ¹C³šÁE¶ ³&´ ¸$»g¹Y¯ ÁE¶ ¾ ¾:ÈPµ ´5¾T®M³Nµ ¶ ³B³Aµ ´[Á ¯:Ç ¯'¾ÁE»5² ¹ƒ³ ÁE»5²$¾ ® À,¶ ¯{º/³-¶ ¯]º ³Nµ ´ ° ²$¯:³ »gº ¾:È » º ³Nµ ´ ¸5¹&»5² º ® » ¿ ¿N¹&¶ ² ® áA® ´ ÁE´ ±/³ ¯ »gºâáAÁ/»gº/¿ ² ° ¯T»gº É ÊIµ ² ° ËE³Aµ ´_° ¶ ¯T®a̝² ® ¸ À ´ º/³5° ² ± ± »g¹ƒ³Y°ã³Aµ ´ 18 äEå æ ç-è æ/ç é ågæMå ê<ë ì íRî—å5ï æ ð4è5ñgê ågòjçAó è‘ô ñ õ é]æ/ç évê}ê íÅöjð›é]æMçAó é'ð ä õ ð è ÷ÅçNó è õ ñ ñ è ø õ ç é å æ ð)õ ø õ é]æ ðâçŠçAó è ì è ê&è æ ì õ5æ/çYð"õ5ò è çNó õ ç•çNó è ùó õ$ì‡ê ågò&ø$è ì çAó è ô õ òƒçAæ è òYð ó$é]ô ì è è ì õ5æ ì ï ð è ì é:çUé]æ ð ï ú ðâç é:ç ïEç é]æ ø çAó è5é]ò\æ õ û è é]æ ò è ð ô è ä¬çãå ê—çAó è‘çAò&õ ì è û,õ ò üE÷ÅçAó$ï$ðUýjõ5û å êãçAó èUþ$é è ÿ çNó õ çaçNó è>îaé þ é ñ î—å5ï òCç ó õ ð ï òYé'ð ì é ä¬ç é ågæ<ç&å,çAòƒù˜çAó è‡ô ò&è ð è æ/çgð ï é:çNí CONTENTION : Whether plaintiff is bound by the injunction order passed in suit bearing No.635/92.
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bhagwan Singh And Ors. vs Suresh And Ors. on 10 December, 2004

The Court was liable to reject the plaint and a manifest illegality has been committed by the Courts below in rejecting the application under Order VII, Rule 11 C.P.C. Reliance has been placed in the case of I.T.C. Limited v. Rakesh Bihari Srivastava and Ors., A.I.R. 1997, Allahabad, 323, and Chandra Mohan Singhal and Ors. v. State of U.P., 2002 (2), Allahabad Rent Cases, Page 446 of Paragraphs 23, 24 and 25. I have perused judgments cited by the Counsel for the petitioners. The objection raised on behalf of the petitioners is not disputed that in the event certain questions/pleas already contended and contested up to the highest Court of the land has been adjudicated in the previous suit then subsequent suit should not be permitted to continue. The principle laid down in the aforesaid cases are not disputed but in the present case the trial Court has rejected the application under Order VII, Rule 11 C.P.C. which has been challenged in the writ petition. It is always open for the petitioner to get the question decided by the Courts below after getting a preliminary issue on the question of maintainability of the suit decided after recording evidence. The trial Court has clearly recorded a finding that the objections raised by the petitioners as to whether the suit is barred by limitation or on which date the plaintiff got the knowledge about the execution of sale deed is to be decided after evidence is led by either parties, the question is yet to be decided by the Courts below. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the writ petition at this stage and pre-empt the decision of the Courts below.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - P Srivastava - Full Document
1