Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)
Documents citing Dheeraj vs State Of Haryana on 13 November, 2014

Rajesh Kalan vs State Of Haryana on 21 July, 2020

Even though there is nothing on record to indicate earlier complaint of demand of dowry and harassment, the same in itself is not sufficient to find that 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 27-09-2020 20:33:24 ::: Crl. Misc. No. M-18419 of 2020 -3- Mansiha was not being subjected to harassment. Reliance upon order dated 18.06.2020 passed in CRM-M-13808-2020 titled as Dheeraj vs. State of Haryana by learned counsel for the petitioner is misplaced as in the said case there was no evidence of the nature discussed in the present case. Dowry death is a very serious malady with which our Society is afflicted. Thus, the petitioners do not deserve any discretionary relief.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Mittal - Full Document

Harbans Singh vs State Of Punjab on 19 September, 2018

Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that he does not challenge the conviction of the petitioner and would confine his prayer in this petition only to the reduction of the sentence. He has contended that the incident took place 17 years ago and the petitioner was the driver of the offending vehicle. He is the sole bread winner of his family and has undergone sentence of imprisonment of one year, four months and twenty days out of the total sentence of two years. He is not involved in any other case. He has also relied upon a judgment of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Dheeraj Vs. State of Haryana, CRR-2460-2016, 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 07-10-2018 20:08:13 ::: CRR No. 706 of 2006 -3- decided on 08.09.2016, whereby sentence of the petitioner therein, who was convicted for offence under Section 304-A IPC, had been reduced to the already undergone period of three months and five days.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A S Grewal - Full Document
1