Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.49 seconds)
Documents citing M/S.Commercial Steel Company vs The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax on 4 March, 2020

Slm Stationery vs Union Of India on 5 March, 2025

12. For the above reasons, we allow the appeal and set aside the impugned order [Commercial Steel Co. v. Commr. of State Tax, 2020 SCC OnLine TS 291] of the High Court. The writ petition filed by the respondent shall stand dismissed. However, this shall not preclude the respondent from taking recourse to appropriate remedies which are available in terms of Section 107 of the CGST Act to pursue the grievance in regard to the action which has been adopted by the State in the present case.
Karnataka High Court Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

The Vetri Motors Private Limited vs The State Tax Officer on 12 November, 2024

12. For the above reasons, we allow the appeal and set aside the impugned order [Commercial Steel Co. v. Commr. of State Tax, 2020 SCC OnLine TS 291] of the High Court. The writ petition filed by the respondent shall stand dismissed. However, this shall not preclude the respondent from taking recourse to appropriate remedies which are available in terms of Section 107 of the CGST Act to pursue the grievance in regard to the action which has been adopted by the State in the present case.”
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Srinivas Fine Arts (P) Ltd vs The State Tax Officer (Review) on 29 November, 2024

12. For the above reasons, we allow the appeal and set aside the impugned order [Commercial Steel Co. v. Commr. of State Tax, 2020 SCC OnLine TS 291] of the High Court. The writ petition filed by the respondent shall stand dismissed. However, this shall not preclude the respondent from taking recourse to appropriate remedies which are available in terms of Section 107 of the CGST Act to pursue the grievance in regard to the action which has been adopted by the State in the present case.”
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Karuppasami Traders vs Commercial Tax Officer on 14 February, 2025

12. For the above reasons, we allow the appeal and set aside the impugned order [Commercial Steel Co. v. Commr. of State Tax, 2020 SCC OnLine TS 291] of the High Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/6 W.P.(MD)No.3439 of 2025 The writ petition filed by the respondent shall stand dismissed. However, this shall not preclude the respondent from taking recourse to appropriate remedies which are available in terms of Section 107 of the CGST Act to pursue the grievance in regard to the action which has been adopted by the State in the present case.”
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.The Marthandam Bee Keepers vs The Commissioner Of Cgst And Central ... on 18 February, 2025

12. For the above reasons, we allow the appeal and set aside the impugned order [Commercial Steel Co. v. Commr. of State Tax, 2020 SCC OnLine TS 291] of the High Court. The writ petition filed by the respondent shall stand dismissed. However, this shall not preclude the respondent from taking recourse to appropriate remedies which are available in terms of Section 107 of the CGST Act to pursue the grievance in regard to the action which has been adopted by the State in the present case.”
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Hydrolic Corporation Kerala vs The Asst. State Tax Officer on 11 August, 2020

EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 26.3.2018 EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE GST INVOICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT HEREIN DATED 5.7.2020 EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE E-WAY BILL DATED 5.7.2020 EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT FROM THE DRIVER IN FORM GST MOV 01 DATED 7.7.2020 EXHIBIT P4 (A) A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER FOR PHYSICAL VERIFICATION IN FORM GST MOV 02 DATED 7.7.2020 EXHIBIT P4 (B) A TRUE COPY OF THE PHYSICAL VERIFICATION REPORT IN FORM GST MOV 04 DATED 7.7.2020 EXHIBIT P4 (C) A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF DETENTION UNDER SECTION 129(1)IN FORM GST MOV 06 DATED 7.7.2020 EXHIBIT P4 (D) A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DETENTION UNDER SECTION 129(3) IN FORM GST MOV 07 PROPOSING TAX AND PENALTY OF RS 64,800/- DATED 10.7.2020 EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE TELUNGANA HIGH COURT IN "COMMERCIAL STEEL COMPANY V. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX" DATED NIL.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A K Nambiar - Full Document
1