Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 332 (0.57 seconds)
Documents citing Baby Radhika Gupta & Ors vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors on 24 November, 2009

Smt Dhaneshwari & Anr. vs Tejeshwar Singh & Ors. on 19 March, 2012

185. There was no evidence with regard to the deceased‟s income or his qualification. His income could have been taken only on the basis of minimum wages payable to an unskilled worker. The addition of 50% was not permissible for the reasons as stated earlier. The loss of dependency comes to `5,91,138/- (`5278 - 1/3 X 12 X 14). The compensation on account of loss of love and affection is also required to be reduced to `25,000/- from `75,000/-.(Sunil Sharma v. Bachitar Singh (2011) 11 SCC 425 and Baby Radhika Gupta v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited (2009) 17 SCC 627).
Delhi High Court Cites 58 - Cited by 181 - G P Mittal - Full Document

Unique Case Id No.02406C0421112 vs Suit Nos.677/2010 & 503/211 (Mukesh Sah ... on 1 December, 2012

"It is urged that the compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- awarded towards loss of love and affection is excessive. Normally, when full compensation towards loss of dependency is granted only a nominal sum is awarded towards loss of love and affection. The trend of the High Court and the Supreme Court is to grant a sum of Rs. 25,000/- under this head. Such a sum was granted by the Supreme Court in Sunil Sharma V. Bachitar Singh (2011) 11 SCC 425 and in Baby Radhika Gupta V. Oriental Insurance Company Limited (2009) 17 SCC 627 towards love and affection.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Managing Director vs Poonjolai on 21 November, 2014

8. The deceased was working as a technician in a lathe work shop. Following the judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Radhika Gupta vs. Oriental Insurance Company Limited 2010 ACJ 758 (SC), and R.K.Malik vs. Kiran Paul 2009 ACJ 1924 (SC) and also a recent decision in Rajesh and others vs. Rajbir Singh and others (2013(3) CTC 883(SC) wherein the Honourable Apex Court held that even in the case of self employed persons, there shall be addition of amount for future prospects, we deem it appropriate to fix the income at Rs.7,500/- per month, as determined by the Tribunal. Thus, his annual income would be Rs.90,000/-.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - M Jaichandren - Full Document

India Lease Development Ltd. vs Savita & Ors. on 5 March, 2012

11. The Claims Tribunal granted a compensation of `1,50,000/- on account of loss of love and affection. The loss of love and affection cannot be measured in terms of money. The Supreme Court in Sunil Sharma v. Bachitar Singh (2011) 11 SCC 425 and in Baby Radhika Gupta v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited (2009) 17 SCC 627 granted only `25,000/- (in total to all the claimants) under the head of loss of love and affection. I would follow the same. The compensation under the head of loss of love and affection is reduced from `1,50,000/- to `25,000/-. On adding `10,000/- each towards loss of consortium, funeral expenses and loss to estate, the overall compensation comes to `4,99,516/-.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 8 - G P Mittal - Full Document

Iffco Tokio Gen. Ins. Company Ltd vs Smt. Kanta Sharma & Ors on 13 July, 2012

5. Normally, when full compensation towards loss of dependency is granted only a nominal sum is awarded towards loss of love and affection. The trend of the High Court and the Supreme Court is to grant a sum of `25,000/- under this head. Such a sum was granted by the Supreme Court in Sunil Sharma v. Bachitar Singh (2011) 11 SCC 425 and in Baby Radhika Gupta MAC APP 717/2012 Page 2 of 12 v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited (2009) 17 SCC 627 towards love and affection.
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - G P Mittal - Full Document

United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs Smt. Rinki @ Rinku & Ors on 23 July, 2012

towards love and affection. Loss of love and affection cannot be measured in terms of money. Thus, when the Claimants are awarded compensation for loss on dependency, actually a nominal sum is awarded under the head of loss of love and affection. Thus, uniformity is to be adopted by the Courts while granting non-pecuniary damages. The Supreme Court in Sunil Sharma v. Bachitar Singh (2011) 11 SCC 425 and in Baby Radhika Gupta v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited (2009) MAC. APP. No.200/2012 Page 7 of 8 17 SCC 627 granted only ` 25,000/- under the head of loss and affection. The compensation under this head is reduced from `1,00,000/- to `25,000/-.
Delhi High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 89 - G P Mittal - Full Document

Cholamandalam Ms General Ins Co. Ltd. vs Ram Kumar & Ors. on 19 July, 2012

8. It is urged that the compensation of `1,00,000/- awarded towards loss of love and affection is excessive. Normally, when full compensation towards loss of dependency is granted only a nominal sum is awarded towards loss of love and affection. The trend of the High Court and the Supreme Court is to grant a sum of `25,000/- under this head. Such a sum was granted by the Supreme Court in Sunil Sharma v. Bachitar Singh (2011) 11 SCC 425 and in Baby Radhika Gupta v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited (2009) 17 SCC 627 towards love and affection.
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 36 - G P Mittal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next