Sahanur Ali @ Sahinur Islam vs The Union Of India And 5 Ors on 5 May, 2025
15. The Court does not find any good reason to take a view different than one
expressed in the judgment rendered in the case of Ayub Ali (Md.) (supra), which
is a binding precedent, in the absence of any cogent and acceptable explanation
from the petitioner for not being able to file his written statement of defence
despite the proceedings being adjourned on 12(twelve) occasions and that too,
when he was already having certified copy of the electoral rolls, which have
been annexed to this writ petition. The impugned opinion is not found to be
erroneous or perverse.