Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.36 seconds)

Sakunthala vs State Of Kerala on 28 November, 2012

15. The dictum laid down in the decision reported in 2012 (3) KLT 528 (Sreedevi v. State of Kerala) is not applicable to the facts of this case and as in this case, he was convicted in two cases of which one has not been considered and after investigation charge-sheet has been submitted in two other cases, and three other cases are pending investigation. So the District Magistrate has considered these aspects and applied his mind and satisfied that he had committed such offences and he will have to be declared as known-goonda.
Kerala High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - K Joseph - Full Document

T.K.Vijayakumari vs Subhash Mohan on 8 August, 2024

14. Therefore, the above discussion leads to the conclusion that, when petitions with prayers to set aside and remit back commission reports being considered, the ratio in Swami Premananda Bharathi's case (supra) is the binding precedent followed in Yudathadevus's case (supra), Laly Joseph @ Laly Sebastian's case (supra) and the decision in Sreedevi's case (supra) declaring the said binding precedent and are the decisions which would hold the field in this regard and contra decisions in Francis Assissi's case (supra), Gopalakrishnan and Another v. V. Ponnappan and others [2021 (5) KHC 548 : 2021 KHC OnLine 640 : 2021 (5) KLT 751 : ILR 2021 (4) Ker.
Kerala High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs State Of Kerala on 24 June, 2024

(e) Arising or resulting from the insured person committing any breach of l aw with criminal intent.'' This Court in Sreedevi (supra) considered the challenge to the validity of a similar Clause, excluding the liability of the WP(C) NO. 3566 OF 2016 6 Insurance Company in a case where the person suffering disablement or death was under the influence of alcohol at the relevant time and this Court found as follows:-
Kerala High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document

Sherly Thomas vs G Jayachandran on 18 March, 2026

The impugned order in O.P(C).No.1706 of 2025, has considered the effect of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Laly Joseph vs. Francis [2023 (3) KHC 678] and the judgment in Sreedevi vs. State of Kerala [2024 (2) KLT 645] and held that it was open to the court to remit a Commission report for further inquiry and also appoint a fresh commission without setting aside the earlier commission report.
Kerala High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - T R Ravi - Full Document

G. Jayachandran vs Sherly Thomas on 18 March, 2026

The impugned order in O.P(C).No.1706 of 2025, has considered the effect of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Laly Joseph vs. Francis [2023 (3) KHC 678] and the judgment in Sreedevi vs. State of Kerala [2024 (2) KLT 645] and held that it was open to the court to remit a Commission report for further inquiry and also appoint a fresh commission without setting aside the earlier commission report.
Kerala High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - T R Ravi - Full Document
1