Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (1.24 seconds)
Documents citing Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. vs Dr.Deepak Kumar on 20 December, 2010

Shri Vinod Kumar vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 5 July, 2011

In pursuance of Honble High Court of Delhis common order dated 28.11.2005 in 19 CWPs titled Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Vs. Deepak Kumar + 18 others against the common order 24.12.04 of Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi, the Commissioner of Police, Delhi constituted a Committee consisting of Shri Ajay Chadha, Jt. C.P./HQ as Chairman and Shri A.K.Sinha, Jt. C.P./Vig. and Shri R.S. Ghumman, La to CP as Members to assist him to decide the candidature of 19 candidates who were provisionally selected for appointment to the post of Const.(Exe.) in Delhi Police.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 23 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Shri Deepak Kumar (Roll No.913049) vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 8 February, 2012

Reiterating the decision of the Delhi High Court in Deepak Kumar & Ors. (supra), the Tribunal had held that the nature of offence and the manner of acquittal must be gone into properly. While going into the details, it was felt that the nature of offence could not be exclusively determinable only on the label or the sections on which an FIR may be registered. Further, the attending circumstances leading to commission of crime, nature of offence that may appear from the contents of the First Information Report, statements of witnesses and the medical evidence, all attendant circumstances needed consideration. While considering the manner of acquittal, merely observing that the witnesses had turned hostile was not found to be a sufficient ground to deny appointment to a citizen. On the other hand, the judgment of the criminal court had to be taken into consideration with all the aspects leading to acquittal.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 19 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Shri Jitender Kumar @ Jitender Singh vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 5 July, 2011

In pursuance of Honble High Court of Delhis common order dated 28.11.2005 in 19 CWPs titled Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Vs. Deepak Kumar + 18 others against the common order 24.12.04 of Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi, the Commissioner of Police, Delhi constituted a Committee consisting of Shri Ajay Chadha, Jt. C.P./HQ as Chairman and Shri A.K.Sinha, Jt. C.P./Vig. and Shri R.S. Ghumman, La to CP as Members to assist him to decide the candidature of 19 candidates who were provisionally selected for appointment to the post of Const.(Exe.) in Delhi Police.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pankaj vs Gnct Of Delhi on 19 April, 2011

In ultimate analysis, as to whether the accused has been acquitted by giving benefit of doubt or it is a case of clean acquittal, has also to be seen We may reiterate that the Honble Delhi High Court in Deepak Kumar & Others (supra) held that the nature of offence and manner of acquittal has to be gone into properly. Further, the concerned authorities have to find out if the offence alleged against a person involves moral turpitude and that the same is heinous, grave and committed with such evil propensities that he may not deserve to be appointed. Simply observing the provisions of IPC with which a person may be charged and tried, does not appear to be sufficient compliance of the directions issued by the Honble High Court. The observations made above would be more pertinent if the offence with which a person is charged and tried under the sections that might have been mentioned in the FIR may not appear to be so serious. To illustrate, whereas, it may be permissible to hold the nature of offence to be serious when a person is tried under sections 302, 376 and such other offences, the same may not be true when a person is not charged with such serious offences as mentioned above.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next