Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.62 seconds)
Documents citing N.T. Rama Rao vs His Excellency The Governor Of Andhra ... on 22 December, 1995

State vs . : Pankaj on 20 October, 2022

10.Per contra, the Ld. Counsel for the accused has argued that the State has failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The Ld. Counsel for the accused further argued that the entire case of the prosecution is false and fabricated and the same is evident from the material inconsistencies and contradictions borne out from the material on record. It is argued that the prosecution has failed to discharge the burden cast upon it. Ld. Counsel for the accused has also relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi Jagdish Vs State 1987 Law Suit (Del) 86 & judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in case of T Rama Rao Vs. Andhra Pradesh 1983 Law Suit (AP) 83. As such, it is prayed that the accused be acquitted for the said offence.
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lalit Trikha vs The State on 16 January, 2008

Reliance was also placed on behalf of the appellant on the verdict of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in the case of T. Rama Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in 1984 Cri. L.J. 27 to contend that where when a police officer asked to an accused to stop his car, the accused fled away and in that process hit the motorcycle of a police officer, an offence of assault on a public servant or using a criminal force so as to deter him from discharging his duties as public servant were not brought forth.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohd. Khaja Pasha vs The State Of Telangana on 15 April, 2024

In Thota Chandra Sekhar vs. The state of Andhra Pradesh, through S.H.O., P.S. Eluru Rural, West Godavari 14 SKS,J Crl.P.No.2309 OF 2024 District 12, wherein by relying on various judgment including N.T. Rama Rao (Supra 11) and also the guidelines laid down by the Apex Court in Bhajan Lal (Supra 9) more particularly, guideline No.6, which says that where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the Code or the concerned Act (under which a criminal proceedings is instituted) to the institution and continuance of the proceedings and/or where there is a specific provision in the Code or the concerned Act, providing efficacious remedy to redress the grievance of the party, it was held that the proceedings in the said C.C were quashed by exercising power under Section - 482 of Cr.P.C. It was also further held that the proceedings shall not be continued due to technical defect of obtaining prior permission under Section - 155 (2) of Cr.P.C. and taking cognizance on the complaint filed by V.R.O and it is against the purport of Section - 195 (1) (a) of Cr.P.C.
Telangana High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1